• @chiliedogg
    link
    141 year ago

    I think you misunderstood.

    “Engaged to wait” simply means that you aren’t free to leave and must be paid. If you’re required to be at work, you need to be paid - even if you’re killing time playing cards.

    • Lemminary
      link
      11 year ago

      I see, but the other commenter didn’t say that anybody left, that they were only playing cards.

      • @chiliedogg
        link
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes. I’m arguing that denying their pay is illegal.

        • Lemminary
          link
          11 year ago

          I’m still confused, then

          • @chiliedogg
            link
            21 year ago

            I think you’re agreeing with me.

            I’m saying it’s illegal to deny them their pay because they were required to be at work. “Engaged to wait” basically means “Having nothing to do, but still on the clock.”

            If they showed up to work 20 minutes early to play cards or we’re playing cards during their lunch break, then they’d be “waiting to be engaged” which wouldn’t require payment because they’re free to leave.

            • Lemminary
              link
              11 year ago

              Yeah, I don’t think I was disagreeing, I only wasn’t sure what you meant but I think I get it now.