• @Dippy
    link
    -579 months ago

    An interesting read actually, and while it still has the Elon bad bias, it’s nice to have actual data to back up usage statistics instead of opinion statements.

    • @Tar_alcaran
      link
      889 months ago

      while it still has the Elon bad bias

      So does reality, I wonder what causes it.

      • @Dippy
        link
        189 months ago

        O agreed, however, just opinion pieces are redundant and not interesting to keep reading over and over. I like seeing the data that backs it up vs people just saying it’s declining.

        I actively avoid twitter links at this point, never have any substance anyway.

        • 10EXP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          69 months ago

          Thought I’d add: If anyone ever needs to check a Twitter link out, use a Nitter instance. You can self-host if you want.

        • @guacupado
          link
          49 months ago

          I agree. Dude’s an idiot but blabbing without data is what redcaps do. Everyone else needs to do better. At the turnover of the year everyone was talking about Meta dying and Facebook almost gone even though usage was almost as high as ever and making billions in profits every quarter. Really shows how daft internet comments can be.

    • @jackoneill
      link
      369 months ago

      Elon is pants on head retarded

      • StarServal
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        All while his fans will tell you that pants-on-head is the new cool thing to do.

        • @ttmrichter
          link
          29 months ago

          He’s fooled us all! He’s playing a game of 2-D Chess behind the scenes!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      09 months ago

      First off, Elon is bad. Calling it “Elon bad bias” is like Trump calling anyone who wants him to face trial “Trump haters.” Elon bad bias makes it sound like a) he isn’t actually bad, it’s just an opinion, and b) factual statements about Elon that describe the various ways in which he is indeed bad are just like Trump haters cherry picking the one or two not-bad-but-actually-good things he did. It’s the “fake news” of the Muskies.

      Second, the entire article is about why the reported numbers are obvious bullshit. He’s using made-up KPIs that can’t be compared to others in the industry or to wxTwitter’s past performance. It’s like asking how a developer is doing and being told they have the highest number of characters committed or written per second for the past seven Mondays.

      If he was looking at good numbers, he’d publish them. As it is estimates are that exTwitter’s worth has dropped between 2/3s and 90%. If the latter is correct, Musk has personally steered a company that was at the top of its market into utter ruin an $40B on fire just because he can’t admit a mistake.

      And that is one of the things that makes him bad.