• @Dad2DnA
    link
    13
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “It’s ridiculous this was allowed to happen and that nobody checked or cared about what the “First Ukrainian Division” was.”

    The guy who invited and introduced him said he did it because the dude was from his district, and didn’t bother to tell anybody about it, which is plausable, I guess. What’s shocking to me is that he is the Speaker of the House. He clearly didn’t do his research, and doesn’t know his history (he said the Nazi bravely fought the Russians for the independence of Ukraine, or some stupid shit like that). What is this, the US?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Things get a bit murky with the volounters of eastern europe there was a ss division from balticum that after the war where put as guards at nurnberg.

      • @banneryear1868OP
        link
        11 year ago

        Yeah unfortunately a lot of that murkiness involved siding with Hitler even if the individual was only motivated by Ukrainian independence, at least that’s probably the best case scenario, a lot of times that also involved fascist sentiments. These units committed atrocities, not all of them, but they were all treated the same after the war and allowed to resettle. Is it possible with some of these individuals to empathize but not sympathize as a historical approach would take? Whatever the answer, I don’t think it’s appropriate to honor them for their service like what just happened in the entire house of commons.

        Calling it a blunder might even be an understatement, although I don’t think a lot of the House knew this was happening or had a chance to assess this guy before they performatively “honored” him, which potentially makes it even stupider.