• @Supervisor194
    link
    164
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We have a dramatic shortage of residential property. We have a dramatic oversupply of commercial property. IF ONLY THERE WAS A SOLUTION

    • SuperDuper
      link
      721 year ago

      IF ONLY THERE WAS A SOLUTION

      Middle managers: I agree. From now on you’ll be required to be in office 4 days a week instead of 2!

      • Flying Squid
        link
        51 year ago

        They’ll never get the smell out either. Not completely. I feel sorry for the students.

    • @TheHotze
      link
      71 year ago

      Unfortunately, in most cities that is illegal. Zoning laws prevent turning commercial property into residential even when it is possible. It also prevents developers from building moderate, high, and even certain types of low density housing.

      • @Gabu
        link
        111 year ago

        In most US cities. Hmm, I wonder if we can spot a solution…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Be careful what you wish for. Houston is notorious for abolishing its zoning laws, which means that residential and commercial properties are haphazardly scattered rather than concentrated into distinct areas.

          People never know when a CVS will pop up next door to their home. Now you know why they form HOAs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -271 year ago

      For the millionth time it’s not that simple. Retrofitting commercial buildings is often impossible or more expensive than just demolishing and building new which is also ungodly expensive especially with how high interest rates are right now. Unless cities step in with millions of dollars per project it’s usually not financially possible.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        311 year ago

        If the problem is money then there is no problem. It becomes a necessity and you can’t just not afford necessity. We allegedly are the richest country they need to figure it out regardless of cost. That simple.

        It’s like climate change, there is no issue with money it just has to get done. Pay for it regardless of the cost. It is necessary

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          But what if we let the children pay for it when they grow up? Yes, the cost will be several orders of magnitude more, but we don’t have to think about that now.

          • ANGRY_MAPLE
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            I mean, hopefully fewer people from the future generation will be homeless. It’s pretty rough starting out now, especially if you aren’t lucky enough to have a wealthy family.

            What we’ve been doing for the last number of years just isn’t working. The solution isn’t to keep procrastinating it indefinitely. There has always been debt that’s pushed onto future generations, but this debt might actually help them.

            I wish that people started building more housing many years ago. If housing was cheaper, increased taxes wouldn’t be as big of a concern. This is because there would also be more money available to spend. This means spending money for food, transportation, schooling, and more.

            Instead, currently many people are using the limited housing as investments and retirement plans. Life expectancies are increasing, and births are still happening. Where do you propose people live if there isn’t housing available?

            Rural forests in uninhabited areas also aren’t a legitimate option for most people. No running water, no heat, no medical care available, no pharmacies, no stores, no places to work, and nowhere to buy tools to build shelter. That sounds like a very bad time for most people.

      • @Potatos_are_not_friends
        link
        191 year ago

        Retrofitting commercial buildings is often impossible or more expensive than just demolishing

        That sounds like a “them” problem.

        They can watch their investments dry up and lose billions, or pivot to the new market. Not our fault they’re stuck in the 80s.

      • @I_Fart_Glitter
        link
        191 year ago

        I live on the North end of the SF Bay Area and literally every empty lot and a shit load of pasture land and open space is currently being developed into either low income apartments, high end apartments, town houses or track homes. It’s honestly kind of shocking. Everywhere you go, new residential development.

        Sonoma County supervisors were supposed to vote on a housing development plan in January, but failed to do so until August, and in the meantime there was a special rule that allowed builders to go ahead without most of the red tape they usually face. They took the opportunity and ran with it.

        • Kalkaline
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s more than that though, where do you bathe in an office?

          I’m not saying it can’t be done, but it’s a lot of work to redo the plumbing, electrical, install kitchens, and seal those spaces into secure private zones with natural light exposure.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          What I hear is mostly water pipes. Commercial buildings have them concentrated in bathrooms and hard to split for each residence.

          I know there are bathroom less really cheap places but that attract type of people which property management/urban development corps dont want so they may also be reluctant for that change.

            • ANGRY_MAPLE
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Thank you for being open to change.

              It sucks seeing so many people recognize that the current system isn’t working, and then insist that the fix is to keep doing the same thing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        This is such bullshit. It doesn’t cost millions of dollars to add new plumbing, HVAC, and interior walls.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Say you have an average size house, with a 2-car garage on the side. You decide to change that garage into a small apartment for renting. You need to add a wall or two, add insulation, build up a kitchen area (with proper water and power) and a bathroom.

          Imagine how much that would cost you for that single apartment. Now multiply that by, say, 50, to convert a large office building into 50 residential rental units. Even with economies of scale, that’s still going to cost millions…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Actually it’s not bullshit. Most office buildings are designed with large core space where the elevators and stairs etc go. That’s not at all how apartment buildings are designed. Changing that is extremely expensive.

      • @MotoAsh
        link
        331 year ago

        Buildings not even built strong enough for multipurpose use. Ahh the “efficiency” of capitalism…

        Also, no one said it has to be rennovated to be exactly like normal apartments. Some mixedly shared living spaces exist in some entire cultures for crying out loud.

          • @Gabu
            link
            21 year ago

            Because most non-US cultures didn’t decide to build their cities in the stupidest way possible.

              • @Gabu
                link
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Brazil is as young as the US and, despite interference from the former, still managed just fine to build walkable cities. Japan too.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            America is supposed to be a melting pot of different cultures, I think we can make it work and I’m sure those who are unhoused would much rather be able to live in a communal space with a roof and shower than nothing. Fuck corporate real estate profits and let the people live ffs

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        I’ll take an entire floor for the cost of one bachelor unit.

        If you think that’s not fair to the building owner, I agree, they made a bad investment.

        • @Cryophilia
          link
          21 year ago

          That’s what I’m saying, convert them to ridiculously high end massive floor plan condos, we don’t need whole buildings of studios and 1br

      • @dustyData
        link
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This might come as a shock to you but, human dignity doesn’t give a fuck about commercial real state value. Because commercial real estate owners don’t give a fuck about human dignity. So reciprocating the same level of care is fine for most.

          • @dustyData
            link
            01 year ago

            You’re a bad person. I’m glad that you recognize that. It puts my moral judgment at ease to know that you’re perfectly aware that you are a bad person.

      • @Potatos_are_not_friends
        link
        41 year ago

        if only there was a solution that wouldnt immediately destroy billions of dollars in commercial real estate.

        Please. Will somebody think of the poor poor investors?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        You may be correct but we need to think of solutions. Not just rely on conventional wisdom thats says it’s not possible by current standards

      • @LrdThndr
        link
        01 year ago

        most standard office floors dont have more than two or maybe 3 restrooms

        Oh no! Too bad they don’t sell common plumbing supplies at the Home Goddamned Depot.