Just 1% of people are responsible for half of all toxic emissions from flying.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    If it were up to me we’d blanket ban anything that only the ultra rich can afford and force them to put the funds into improving public services. If they want private flights, great, but they also have to offer them at an affordable price to the average person. Basically, “if you didn’t bring enough for the whole class, you can’t eat it,” but for rich people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      You’ve got it exactly backwards. The problem isn’t that the rich buy too much. The problem is that they don’t buy enough. They lend and invest and leverage and otherwise use their money to create debts owed to them.

      The cars they buy each pay autoworker wages. The shares they buy in that car company creates an obligation on the company to pay them dividends.

      We should be doing everything we can to increase their costs and decrease returns on excessive investments, while removing impediments on them buying services and manufactured products.

    • Spzi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      If they want private flights, great, but they also have to offer them at an affordable price to the average person.

      Individual motorized transport for the masses, but in the skies? This would ultimately doom our ecosphere. Let’s instead have less flights, less individual transport and more mass transit.

      I think I generally agree to your idea but want to include future generations; sustainability. It’s not enough to allow all currently living people a certain lifestyle. What good is it if the result is a scorched Earth a few decades later?

      Or maybe you didn’t mean it that way. Sorry then, still wanted to make that point.