Preferably the hell of the blood-soaked Bible

  • smashboy
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    I’ve heard people say the opposite, “wouldn’t piss on her if she was on fire”.

    • TommySalami
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Well, hell is supposed to be forever. Eventually the liquid piss would evaporate, leaving behind solid compounds that, in my experience, would still smell quite bad. And then, she’d burst into flames again. Sounds like a win-win.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I was witness to what burnt piss does on a hot muffler.

        It stinks, for miles. And months.

    • Greyscale
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      On fire is a good start

      On fire and soaked in piss is better

    • @puppy
      link
      11 year ago

      Actually both have the same meaning. Pissing on her while she’s on fire would be to save her by soaking. And it’s the least you can do (easier than getting water). This saying means that they wouldn’t save Margaret Thatcher even if it was trivially easy to do so.

        • @puppy
          link
          21 year ago

          Yeah sorry. Since you mentioned it’s the opposite, I wrongly assumed that you didn’t know the meaning.