• Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -231 year ago

    You don’t have to respect any laws. That’s your progitive. However, don’t claim a moral high ground

    • @Seasoned_Greetings
      link
      English
      161 year ago

      I see what you’re getting at, but I think ‘moral high ground’ might not be the phrase you’re looking for.

      Laws and morals are explicitly different. That’s why juries exist, so that a law may be put against the morals of a situation and the morals may prevail if need be.

      Breaking the law isn’t necessarily immoral. It’s just illegal. So it isn’t like someone breaking the law is seeking to take the moral high ground in the first place, nor does that mean that someone who only ever follows the law always has the moral high ground. Lawful-evil does exist.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -101 year ago

        Your argument falls though when you start personally benefiting from you pirated media. If you don’t want to support companies don’t watch or use there products and don’t give them your money

        • @Seasoned_Greetings
          link
          English
          81 year ago

          My argument was that you can’t claim the moral high ground based on legality alone. I understand that nuance exists in the context, but moral high ground does not come from whether or not it’s legal.

    • ArxCyberwolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      I don’t care about the moral high ground. Large corporations can go fuck themselves, seeing as they fuck us every day.