• Flying Squid
      link
      691 year ago

      Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

    • Hot Saucerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      From the article, it sounds like there’s been specific legal stuff going on that influenced this:

      Newsom’s signature on Thursday reflects the power and influence of labor unions in the nation’s most populous state, which have worked to organize fast food workers in an attempt to improve their wages and working conditions.

      It also settles — for now, at least — a fight between labor and business groups over how to regulate the industry. In exchange for higher pay, labor unions have dropped their attempt to make fast food corporations liable for the misdeeds of their independent franchise operators in California, an action that could have upended the business model on which the industry is based. The industry, meanwhile, has agreed to pull a referendum related to worker wages off the 2024 ballot.

      So yeah, labor unions bringing cases that could effectively dismantle the corporate/franchisee relationship is a big, big deal to fast food companies, which are generally the most “franchised” types of businesses in the US. Agreeing to higher pay to slow unionization efforts and to outright stop cases that change how the core of their businesses function seems like a smart short-term move on their part.

      It would still be better if it was for everyone, but this particularly seems to have some history behind why it happened for just these workers.

    • Dr. Moose
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      This focus is kinda weird ngl. Why is fast food entertainment being protected and promoted? Let the market crush this shit - we don’t need more McDonald’s garbage in this world.

      • El Barto
        link
        261 year ago

        Welp, decades of data can tell you that “letting the market crush this shit” ain’t working.

        • @foggy
          link
          61 year ago

          You and I have very different definitions on what it means to let the market do it’s thing, I think.

          You aware how heavily subsidized beef is, for McDonald’s sake?

          • BolexForSoup
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            We can raise minimum wages and reduce subsidies. It’s not like it’s one or the other.

            • @SheeEttin
              link
              English
              41 year ago

              We should shift the meat and dairy subsidies into fake/lab meat and oat milk.

              • Maeve
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                I’m from farm country (thankfully no CAFOs, locally) and ngl. While I like oat milk, I love cold, whole dairy milk. As in I live alone and easily drink a gallon or more per week.

                • subignition
                  link
                  fedilink
                  31 year ago

                  At 52 gallons a year you are drinking over 3x the average amount of milk

                  • Maeve
                    link
                    fedilink
                    01 year ago

                    Probably. It helps stretch the “food.”

            • Maeve
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              One lobby is regular people; the other are billionaires and corporations.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        I don’t think your post makes sense.

        Fast food is being targeted for not paying their workers a living wage. This is the opposite of protection and promotion.

        The government is stepping in because the ‘free market’ hasn’t corrected this and won’t correct it.

        Am I misunderstanding where you’re coming from?

        • Dr. Moose
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          In a way it does protect the market by forcing it competitive. The market definitely has the power to squeeze fast food out of existence.