@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agoyou energydiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1516arrow-down114
arrow-up1502arrow-down1imageyou energydiscuss.tchncs.de@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squarepancakeslinkfedilinkEnglish8•edit-21 year agoIt’s not incorrect, it’s just the way engineers do equations. e = mc π = 3 g = 10 m/s²
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoSpoken like someone who’s never met an engineer
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoIn natural units, where c = ħ =1, both statements are equally true. But then, the whole premise is lost because in these units, E = m (for stationary bodies).
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoAnd m represents mass, not matter. Matter has mass, but that doesn’t mean it is mass.
*the speed of light squared
So close
It’s not incorrect, it’s just the way engineers do equations.
e = mc
π = 3
g = 10 m/s²
Well, what is then the last symbol doing in the last line?
Spoken like someone who’s never met an engineer
In natural units, where c = ħ =1, both statements are equally true. But then, the whole premise is lost because in these units, E = m (for stationary bodies).
And m represents mass, not matter. Matter has mass, but that doesn’t mean it is mass.
Where have you seen square light? Duh!
That’s not a face I expected to see today.