cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/177673

Cross posting this here for visibility since lemmy.ml federation has been very hit or miss the last week. Original post from @[email protected]

Today, a bunch of new instances appeared in the top of the user count list. It appears that these instances are all being bombarded by bot sign-ups.

For now, it seems that the bots are especially targeting instances that have:

  • Open sign-ups
  • No captcha
  • No e-mail verification

I have put together a spreadsheet of some of the most suspicious cases here.

If this is affecting you, I would highly recommend considering one of the following options:

  1. Close sign-ups entirely
  2. Only allow sign-ups with applications
  3. Enable e-mail verification + captcha for sign-ups

Additionally, I would recommend pre-emptively banning as many bot accounts as possible, before they start posting spam!

Please comment below if you have any questions or anything useful to add.

  • @cerevant
    link
    English
    62 years ago

    Sadly, this may signal the end of open federation. I can’t see how trust by default is going to work long term.

    • Ulu-Mulu-no-die
      link
      English
      102 years ago

      It depends on how federated platforms react, it’s necessary to control who signs up in some way, if that’s “globally” accepted trust can hold well long term.

      • @cerevant
        link
        English
        122 years ago

        Right now the instances are working to stifle this by restricting account creation, but we’re just a step away from spammers creating instances on demand, flooding networks with stuff like the crypto spam on Reddit. I’m thinking major instances are going to have to go whitelist federation as a result.

        • marsokod
          link
          English
          82 years ago

          I would not be surprised if at some point you have a few whitelists, or some kind of reputation management for instances. One could even say they can have a karma number associated to them.

          In the end, this is the same problem as for emails and the landscape will probably structure itself around several big actors and countless of smaller actors who will have to be really careful in order to not be defederated.

          • @Zak
            link
            English
            52 years ago

            A reputation system is really important. Open federation may not be viable long term without one.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            That’s an interesting idea. For each instance give users the ability to mark as spam comments/posts, then make it so each instance keeps track of what the ratio of spam vs not-spam is coming from peer instances and block any that exceed a certain ratio. It could easily be made automatic with manual intervention for edge cases.

            One issue I could see is that it could be used as a way of blacklisting smaller instances from larger instances by using bot accounts on the larger instances to mark the smaller instance’s legitimate traffic as spam. It would likely be necessary to implement a limit on how young/active an account can be to mark comments/posts as spam, as well as rate-limiting for situations where a given smaller community that is a subset of the larger one decides to dogpile on a smaller instance in an attempt to block them from the entire community.

        • Ulu-Mulu-no-die
          link
          English
          42 years ago

          Then we need better tools to detect those.

    • @awh
      link
      English
      12 years ago

      Aw man, does that mean that I won’t be able to set up my own instance?

      • @cerevant
        link
        English
        12 years ago

        You will, but you may need to jump through some hoops to get federated with some of the more popular instances.

    • @CinnerB
      link
      English
      0
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        You just described token gating, not multisig. Also you can do multisig without involving any money (or tokens)

        • @CinnerB
          link
          English
          12 years ago

          My comment says deleted by creator (I didn’t delete it) so I don’t remember exactly what I said, but the point is to temporarily (as long as the account exists) put money on the books, which can be taken if you spam but you can withdrawal it when you close your account if you don’t. There would need to be a trusted signing authority so instance admins couldn’t just take it.