• Solar Bear
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    So you’re just done engaging with what I say and are now deflecting, got it. I was correct when I said that the clarity of the law was never important to you and wouldn’t affect your support of it.

    • @cricket97
      link
      01 year ago

      I already said I think you’re being pedantic and you keep harping on the same thing over and over. I think the law is clear enough and I don’t forsee anyone not doing inappropriate shit to be prosecuted under this law. You could apply the same criticism to literally any law. In the context of legislation, this bill is pretty clear what it prevents. If you disagree, fine, move on.

      • Solar Bear
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not pedantic to expect the law to hold the same standard to “sexual gesticulation” as it did to “premises”, but it’s clear you suddenly lost all that enthusiasm you had before to actually defend the law on its merits. I’m just sad that the conversation about the actual text of the law couldn’t even make it further than the first question.

        Have a good day.

        • @cricket97
          link
          01 year ago

          You are unbearable lol. You posted a “gotcha” and I didn’t bite so you stubbornly disregard anything I said in response. Have a good one, I hope you come up with some better arguments next time.

          • Solar Bear
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            so you stubbornly disregard anything I said in response.

            I’m actually curious, what did I stubbornly disregard? Because I can list things you stubbornly refused to engage with, but I’m not aware of any point of yours that I didn’t respond to. If I did, I will happily do so now.