A bonus one:

AI generated image of Nadja from WWDITS in the style of a Disney character

  • @FooBarrington
    link
    191 year ago
    1. Typing a sentence into a search bar is not a computer skill.

    Running AI models takes more skill than “typing a sentence into a search bar”, but you obviously don’t understand that is possible.

    1. No, AI is not free. They charge minimum $10 for a few credits to run an algorithm you have to run multiple times, burning through all of your credits, for a final result that looks shitty and can’t be customizable.

    My guy, if you download a model and run it locally, you don’t pay anyone. It runs on your computer.

    1. Human artists actually are cheaper. You’re wasting more money on the AI that you could have saved just having a human paint it for you.

    Show me the artist that would do this for the price of ~10 minutes of electricity. Should be a couple cents.

    1. Your actual motivation for using AI is to avoid other human beings. For all of your misanthropy, you certainly have no problem letting the most evil humans of all, people who run tech companies, exploit your dislike of others for their benefit, feeding the very beast you hate.

    You seem very angry while not really understanding what you’re replying to. Maybe calm down a little and reflect on what’s going on in your life to make you behave this way?

      • @FooBarrington
        link
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It literally doesn’t but go ahead and keep lying to yourself about your own indolence if that’s what makes you happy.

        It literally does. I just typed a sentence into my search bar, and it didn’t cause an AI model to run on my computer. How can that be? And I can promise you: there is not a single sentence in this world you can type into a search bar that would make my computer do what you describe.

        1. The downloadable models require GPUs that can cost hundreds of dollars.

        No? Have you not heard of CPU inference?

        1. Most of the AIs out are closed source and proprietary.

        No? Literally, most models are openly available. Where do you get this idea?

        You can literally go on fiverr or Deviantart and find artists that cost much, much less than the overpriced GPUs and membership fees you all are paying to fool other people, and yourself, into thinking you have access to talent when you do not.

        Are you trolling? What membership fees do you think I’m paying when I run models locally? Why do you think I bought my GPU for this purpose?

        • @NightAuthor
          link
          English
          161 year ago

          Not only did you clearly buy a GPU specifically for making this Nadia image, you obviously bought it from Mark Zuckerberg and you’re directly funding the corruption of the internet that will lead to the downfall of humanity.

          • Rikudou_SageOPM
            link
            fedilink
            81 year ago

            I also kicked a cute looking puppy once for every image generated until I was happy with the result.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Some folks already have GPUs and the chops to run them locally, so they’re opting to go that route.

        Sure, it might be cheaper and easier for YOU to pay an artist, but you gotta recognize that’s due to your own circumstance, not necessarily that of others.

        If you don’t have the GPU, I believe you’re able to use googles colab notebooks to run models, so that’s not really much of an issue. Alternatively, rundiffusion is a cloud service that costs 50 cents for an hour.

        Stable diffusion is free.

        You’ve argued that it takes no skill to run models yourself, so I expect you to be up and running real quick!