• iltoroargento
    link
    fedilink
    56
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I think they meant not run the first time? As in: he doesn’t run, and therefore doesn’t get elected, so he stays away from the spotlight and can, relatively, quietly live his life with his foot in his mouth at every turn, but nobody cares because he’s a D list celebrity.

    And of course, not being the president, he has no access to half of the shit he’s dealing with federally. I feel like the state stuff in NY was a pretty long time coming, but the federal stuff could’ve been avoided had he lost or not ran in 2016.

    I don’t even know what a world like that would look like, but I’m sure it would’ve been better than the four years we had of him.

    Edit: Mobile, misspelled some things due to autocorrect.

    • @Archer
      link
      149 months ago

      I don’t even know what a world like that would look like, but I’m sure it would’ve been better than the four years we had of him.

      President Hillary Clinton would be fully supporting Ukraine as House Republicans desperately searched for any excuse to launch their fifth impeachment

      • @WhiskyTangoFoxtrot
        link
        19 months ago

        Clinton would have been out of office for more than a year when the invasion started and the Democrats would have a stain on their record that would have made it much harder to fight whichever Republican fascist (but I repeat myself) was currently in charge.

        • @Archer
          link
          19 months ago

          Out of office? Nah, re-elected