@Custoslibera to [email protected] • 1 year agoDon't be fooled Billy, it's not really a job, more of a parasitic relationshipimagemessage-square278arrow-up11.33Karrow-down1136
arrow-up11.19Karrow-down1imageDon't be fooled Billy, it's not really a job, more of a parasitic relationship@Custoslibera to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square278
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•1 year agoLandlords do not build houses, they own houses. Saying that they provide housing is equivalent to saying Jeff Bezos delivered your latest Amazon package. Owning things is not creating things.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoDo you disagree with something that I wrote or are you reaffirming my point?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•1 year agoThis part: They made it possible that there was a house to rent. Obviously.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•1 year agoWell, didn’t they? They manage the risk that the construction of the house is profitable. You cannot build houses everywhere. If you don’t want landlords then you need public housing. That’s where the voters come in.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•edit-21 year agoNo, most landlords just buy housing. Construction is usually a seperate business.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoHousing is only constructed because there are landlords. If the construction companies don’t sell the properties, they would become the landlords. How do you want the housing market to work without landlords?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-2•edit-21 year ago Housing is only constructed because there are landlords. Bwahahahaha Oh wait, youre serious, let me laugh even harder
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year ago How do you want the housing market to work without landlords?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-2•1 year agoThere shouldn’t be a housing market, markets are inefficient, and you shouldn’t create winners and losers around basic human needs.
Landlords do not build houses, they own houses. Saying that they provide housing is equivalent to saying Jeff Bezos delivered your latest Amazon package.
Owning things is not creating things.
Do you disagree with something that I wrote or are you reaffirming my point?
This part:
Obviously.
Well, didn’t they? They manage the risk that the construction of the house is profitable. You cannot build houses everywhere.
If you don’t want landlords then you need public housing. That’s where the voters come in.
No, most landlords just buy housing. Construction is usually a seperate business.
Housing is only constructed because there are landlords. If the construction companies don’t sell the properties, they would become the landlords.
How do you want the housing market to work without landlords?
Bwahahahaha
Oh wait, youre serious, let me laugh even harder
There shouldn’t be a housing market, markets are inefficient, and you shouldn’t create winners and losers around basic human needs.