I know we’re living in the crapsack timeline, but I didn’t realize it was a crapsack made of little shit people that the Republicans sculpted like they were Play-Doh and then threw them in the sack and made screaming noises, pretending the little shit people were screaming, before declaring that sack to be their new second-in-command after Trump.

  • @YoBuckStopsHere
    link
    English
    571 year ago

    He is disqualified due to the 14th amendment.

    • abff08f4813c
      link
      fedilink
      541 year ago

      Also, specific to the role of Speaker, he’s disqualified due to having been indicted of felonies with a term of more than two years.

      • @Jimbob0i0
        link
        181 year ago

        Technically that’s just a GOP rule… and we know what their reaction is to things like that…

    • themeatbridge
      link
      171 year ago

      He shoild be, but so far the courts so far have disagreed, and the SCOTUS declined to hear the case until more lower courts have ruled. Until he’s convicted, it’s unlikely that he will be pre-emptively disqualified from holding office.

      • @YoBuckStopsHere
        link
        English
        301 year ago

        The Constitution does not state the individual has to be convicted. They only had to aid in any way, shape, or form an insurrection, which he did.

        • themeatbridge
          link
          151 year ago

          I agree with you, but so far the courts have not. Remember that the courts consist of judges who may or may not have allegiances or prejudices that influence their reading of the constitution. So while we can agree we both think Trump should be disqualified by the letter of the law, we cannot know for sure that he will be disqualified. If he is convicted of seditious conspiracy, then the pathway becomes much clearer.

          • GreenBottles
            link
            11 year ago

            If he’s convicted on almost ANY of those 91 indictments on his shoulders, he’s basically eligible for the rest of his life in prison. There’s A LOT of serious charges there. I want to say most carry a 10 year minimum on the low end and 20+ on the high. So… changes are he isn’t getting away with anything here imo.

            • themeatbridge
              link
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Except not all of those charges disqualify him from holding office, and there’s nothing preventing him from running from prison. Then what happens next? What if he wins? It’s not really that far fetched to imagine. I agree, I think it’s unlikely, but I didn’t think it was likely Hillary would shit the bed in 2016, either. So here we are.

              • GreenBottles
                link
                11 year ago

                but you’re making a big assumption that the middle of the road folks out there are going to vote for dude in prison which just isn’t going to happen

                • themeatbridge
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  Anyone that voted for Trump twice is nowhere near the middle of the road. It’s alarming how many of them exist, but that’s our reality. You’re making a big assumption that Trump voters will suddenly be reasonable despite all evidence to the contrary.

        • BraveSirZaphod
          link
          fedilink
          141 year ago

          A conviction would generally be seen as what establishes the fact that the person has done that act.

          Which is probably for the best. I’d remind you that plenty of Americans right now would say that Biden has committed treason of some kind, so it’s probably a good thing that there’s a formal legal process for this.

    • @eran_morad
      link
      91 year ago

      It’s not clear just yet that the law applies to him, in general.

      • @YoBuckStopsHere
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        My State of Colorado doesn’t care about the court, we are going to ban him from the ballot.