Basically title, every bit of online dating nowadays is either Match or Meta, and we’re all about breaking corporate chains right?
So these are the thoughts I had:
-
Matches based on simple user selection: age range, lifestyle, hobbies etc. None of that dumb algorithm stuff that makes you reset your profile every month.
-
ActivityPub protocol so that anyone can run their own instance, but can also be blocked if anything heinous happens.
-
E2EE for messaging (and anything else if it’s possible).
-
Someone wrote an open-source anti-CSAM script for Lemmy recently, I hope we could adapt that to our use.
-
Just, like, everyone have a good time on this app, we’re here for love lol
I am not a coder, so I would have no idea how to do this, but I wonder about the interest in such a creation. Maybe some of you out there could make something I could use to get a date (pls).
Lol. But… We already have grindr. If I’d be gay, why should i use anything else? 😁
It’s still controlled by a single organization, it’s not federated, it’s not open, it’s not Democratic. So if we’re trying to bring democracy to more platforms, why not grinder?
Yea but if I’m going on grindr my main desire is dick not democracy. Grindr is much more of a hookup app than a dating one so your trying to market to a customer based blinded by horniness.
Makes it easier to get a MVP working then :)
Actually i don’t know shit about grinder. Just that it exists. But as long as it’s free (i assume?) and fair, i wouldn’t mind. Most platforms are (or end up) squeezing guys for every penny they have in hopes of finding someone. That is a system that disgusts me.
But simply technically: too few nerdy gays to build a federated grinder. And no cash to market it. And every potential gay would just be like “there’s already grinder, where is the added benefit?”
How much democracy can one expect from a blowjob?
As long as the participants have symmetrical information and are not influenced by a third party, it’s very democratic
deleted by creator