• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -61 year ago

    This is illegal. You can’t make a law that discriminated based on age. This would be effective prohibition for some adults and not others.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      The fuck are you talking about? There are all kinds of laws that make something legal or not based on someone’s age, and they often vary by state or even locale. Hell, there’s a minimum age for running for president for chryssake and it’s well past any definition of adulthood.

    • @lightnegative
      link
      51 year ago

      What are you talking about? Plenty of laws discriminate based on age. Like, the minimum drinking age, the minimum voting age and the minimum age of consent

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        This doesn’t discriminate based on age. This creates a permant class of adults who may exercise a freedom and those who mayn’t.

        • Alex
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Yes - New Zealand introduced this policy first.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            So the only thing to compare itself to is basically itself. The NZ law that it is emulating is not even a year old, so it hasn’t exactly given any data on that in between generation that hasn’t yet been created. I’m not saying it won’t work, I’m just pointing out that this is the only really comparable law.