A lawsuit filed by more victims of the sex trafficking operation claims that Pornhub’s moderation staff ignored reports of their abuse videos.


Sixty-one additional women are suing Pornhub’s parent company, claiming that the company failed to take down videos of their abuse as part of the sex trafficking operation Girls Do Porn. They’re suing the company and its sites for sex trafficking, racketeering, conspiracy to commit racketeering, and human trafficking.

The complaint, filed on Tuesday, includes what it claims are internal emails obtained by the plaintiffs, represented by Holm Law Group, between Pornhub moderation staff. The emails allegedly show that Pornhub had only one moderator to review 700,000 potentially abusive videos, and that the company intentionally ignored repeated reports from victims in those videos.

The damages and restitution they seek amounts to more than $311,100,000. They demand a jury trial, and seek damages of $5 million per plaintiff, as well as restitution for all the money Aylo, the new name for Pornhub’s parent company, earned “marketing, selling and exploiting Plaintiffs’ videos in an amount that exceeds one hundred thousand dollars for each plaintiff.”

The plaintiffs are 61 more unnamed “Jane Doe” victims of Girls Do Porn, adding to the 60 that sued Pornhub in 2020 for similar claims.
Girls Do Porn was a federally-convicted sex trafficking ring that coerced young women into filming pornographic videos under the pretense of “modeling” gigs. In some cases, the women were violently abused. The operators told them that the videos would never appear online, so that their home communities wouldn’t find out, but they uploaded the footage to sites like Pornhub, where the videos went viral—and in many instances, destroyed their lives. Girls Do Porn was an official Pornhub content partner, with its videos frequently appearing on the front page, where they gathered millions of views.

read more: https://www.404media.co/girls-do-porn-victims-sue-pornhub-for-300-million/

archive: https://archive.ph/zQWt3#selection-593.0-609.599

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -41 year ago

    Dunno where you got cars, but yes I need a phone to survive. Do you need to watch women being raped to survive? Come on, you can answer the question without deflecting. Admit that you’re gonna watch porn even knowing some of what you watch is being raped, and that alone isn’t enough to make you stop.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      You’ve shifted the goal posts so hard, and you’re accusing me of deflecting? First it’s “you can vet your sources” and now it’s “you must inherently be watching women get raped, regardless of how hard you vet your sources.” Go on, say it.

      All porn is evil. Stop deflecting it and tell us what you actually think.

      I’ll go ahead and say it - all consumption is evil, full stop, and it’s perpetuated by the people making it in the eternal pursuit of profit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -31 year ago

        I think that choosing to watch porn, knowing that part of what you’re consuming is women being sexually abused could be described as evil yes.

        I also agree that capitalism makes truly ethical consumption nearly or totally impossible. But its not comparable to busting a nut to women being sexually abused. I’m sorry, it isn’t. No matter what way you frame that I will never agree that its even related to the topic of capital. You do not, again, DO NOT have to watch porn.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I’ve answered the question many times. Without going down the “all porn is bad” rabbit hole, no, I don’t need to watch women being raped to survive, and I make an active effort not to.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -31 year ago

        But you still will watch porn, knowing that you’re almoat definitely watching women being sexually abused at some point?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          But you still consume non-essential items, knowing a child died at some point?

          Do you really not see how fruitless this is?