I was glancing through the mod log and saw these two entries. Conspiracy theory communities were both removed for violating rule #3.

What are these rules? If I look in the side bar, rule #3 on both lemmy.ml and sh.itjust.works to me looks like no porn. So why were conspiracy theory communities not allowed? That seems like kind of a community that shouldn’t be an issue on Lemmy… are conspiracy theory subs really something that won’t be allowed here? Honestly that’s kind of disturbing to see already…

  • Lockely
    link
    fedilink
    282 years ago

    It’s not the rules on those servers, but the rules on the server you belong to, i.e lemmy.world. Looking at their main site, their rule 3 is as follows:

    • @CocktailPlasmaOP
      link
      -292 years ago

      Wow. Honestly this makes me seriously contemplate my move to Lemmy. I thought lemmy.world was at least a free speech endorsing server. So now we have the two biggest Lemmy instances out there that are clearly against free speech. Lemmy.ml is moderated by pro CCP mods that remove anything anti-china, and lemmy.world can’t even tolerate a sub about conspiracy theories (which we should all know have a tendency of coming true the past few years) and is therefore already starting with stifling free speech.

      Yeah, go start your own instance… Not everyone wants to run their own instance just to be able to browse communities on other instances that your current instance doesn’t agree with.

      Yeah… This is really putting a sour taste in my mouth about Lemmy already.

      • @Rob
        link
        English
        392 years ago

        The “start your own instance” is twofold. You can indeed move away if you don’t like the rules one instance imposes. But at the same time, being an admin, you get the freedom not to associate with stuff you find problematic. You can’t expect an instance owner to pay for server space to host others’ whims.

        From a more personal point of view, I’m really happy that I don’t have to engage with QAnon BS while browsing. It works well for the users too.

        • @CocktailPlasmaOP
          link
          English
          -112 years ago

          You do realize that conspiracy is far more than qanon stuff, right? It was an interesting sub to read from time to time on Reddit.

          And yeah, I get “just run your own instance”, but not everyone wants to deal with their own instance just to be able to freely browse communities without random censorship. I was hoping Lemmy wouldn’t be that way. Don’t know what it is about some people being so unable to tolerate opposing views from their own…

          • @Lauchs
            link
            English
            182 years ago

            Note the “similarly disproven” section.

            If there are fun, interesting, not comically disproven conspiracy theories/communities, I imagine they’d be welcome.

            Don’t know what it is about some people being so unable to tolerate opposing views from their own…

            No one should have to host your stupid nonsense. Just because I have a party, doesn’t mean I have to invite you.

            We want good conspiracies, not the dangerously stupid stuff. Hence, no Q nonsense.

            • @CocktailPlasmaOP
              link
              English
              02 years ago

              Go look in those communities. There’s MAYBE one post I can see you could consider “QAnon” type stuff. The rest are just general conspiracy related posts.

              • @Lauchs
                link
                English
                12 years ago

                There’s MAYBE one post I can see you could consider “QAnon” type stuff.

                Okay, there you go?

                Also though, hpw does one brpwse removed communities? Jephoa isn’t finding anything.

                • @CocktailPlasmaOP
                  link
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  Okay, there you go?

                  Well, yeah, but is that really how instances are going to handle moderation? A single post they don’t like in a community on another instance and they just block that entire community from their instance? Seems pretty heavy handed.

                  Not sure how on mobile, but on the computer you would have to visit a different instance in order to view one of those communities, and of course if you want to actually participate in it, you would have to create a second Lemmy login on that new instance.

                  • @Lauchs
                    link
                    English
                    12 years ago

                    but is that really how instances are going to handle moderation?

                    You mean, is “is that how someone who is paying to do this out of their own pocket and spending their own time” going to handle moderation? And to answer the correctly phrased question, yes. I would want nothing to do with some subs. Were it drawings of child porn (so technically legal I think) how many images would be too many?

                    Took a visit regardless, that sub seems wretched. Most have been deleted by their own mods, what’s left is “is the WHO the terrorist arm of the UN” which frankly, is dumb and dangerous enough that yeah, I’d count it.

                    But at the end of the day, the same flexibility afforded to the volunteer running the instance is afforded to you! You can go, join an instance that supports your values. But you don’t get to demand that we all have our instance tainted by it. Should that balance switch and the moderation gets too heavy, we too can leave.

          • mihnt
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            You can view those communities hosted on other instances from lemmy quite easily. Nothing stopping you. They just don’t want it on their instance.

          • Netsettler2k
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Is it possible that the posts made on that specific community were specific to Qanon? As in, a conspiracy theory community wouldn’t be blocked just for being a conspiracy theory community. But if the community was flooded with Qanon specific posts, they might remove it because that’s specifically against rule #3.

            I’m in no way arguing for or against this, but wondering if that’s closer to the logic they followed. I would love a good old fashioned conspiracy community, but they do have a tendency to pull in a lot of crazies. Do we know what the posts are like?

      • @GlitzyArmrest
        link
        282 years ago

        which we should all know have a tendency of coming true the past few years

        Sounds like a dogwhistle to me, especially since you provided no further info. Sounds like you need to start your own instance if you want to post BS.

        • GraceGH
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          Arguably they’ve had an instance to fuck off to before it was cool, its called “truth social” lol, lmao, and furthermore rofl

        • @CocktailPlasmaOP
          link
          -92 years ago

          This isn’t a community where I feel it’s appropriate to get into those kind of topics. You’re welcome to PM me if you’re actually curious what I’m talking about.

          But regardless, I was hoping Lemmy would be a good space for free thought. But it’s quickly turning out not to be that way.

          • @GlitzyArmrest
            link
            12 years ago

            Sorry, I’m confused. Someone is in your head controlling your thoughts?

      • SeaGoatGirl
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Try Truth Social or Gab. Both (I believe) are on the Fediverse and you’ll get all the QA conspiracy you could want.

        • @CocktailPlasmaOP
          link
          12 years ago

          I don’t want QAnon conspiracies. That’s not what I’m even asking here. These subs are general conspiracy theory communities though. Not QAnon junk.