Not sure why this got removed from 196lemmy…blahaj.zone but it would be real nice if moderation on Lemmy gave you some sort of notification of what you did wrong. Like an automatic DM or something

  • @force
    link
    0
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ok but one can use “harm” to mean whatever they want. It’s not as simple as saying “harm = bad”. Someone has to decide if something counts as harm, which would be completely subjective and arbitrarily decided.

    • Queen HawlSera
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Okay, what’s something one can do to another person that would be considered harm by some, but not by others?

      • @force
        link
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Simplest moral dilemma – trolley problem. Is it immoral to doom 1 person in order to save 4 people? Is it immoral to sacrifice any number of people, animals, etc. for some “greater good”? That’s something a lot of people would argue about. And do you do something immoral if you don’t take action at all on it?

        You can try to pick an answer and call it morally objective, but anyone who tries to do that is a joke.

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          No it is clear as day, if killing one person saves 10… and doing nothing kills all 11, the choice is obvious.

          • @force
            link
            01 year ago

            That’s your morality. You can be Thanos all you want but it doesn’t make it objectively moral.