• @SpaceNoodle
    link
    31 year ago

    Love it! California should take note.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Yeah it’s incredibly misleading.

        The woman was required to provide evidence for a given year and then gives bills and paperwork covering unrelated years.

        This person sounds dumb or confused.

    • @Nogami
      link
      11 year ago

      She has tenants. Gotta read the article before jumping to conclusions.

      The city just didn’t accept her documentation. Some faceless bureaucrat who doesn’t need to care, protecting their job.