• @SpaceNoodle
    link
    32 years ago

    Love it! California should take note.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        Yeah it’s incredibly misleading.

        The woman was required to provide evidence for a given year and then gives bills and paperwork covering unrelated years.

        This person sounds dumb or confused.

    • @Nogami
      link
      12 years ago

      She has tenants. Gotta read the article before jumping to conclusions.

      The city just didn’t accept her documentation. Some faceless bureaucrat who doesn’t need to care, protecting their job.