The Israeli rescue service Zaka says its paramedics removed more than 260 bodies from a music festival that came under attack by Hamas militants.

The total figure of bodies found is expected to be higher, as other paramedic teams were also working in the area and Zaka added that the bodies “haven’t all been collected yet”.

Early on Saturday morning, Hamas targeted Nova music festival, a techno rave in the desert near the border with Gaza.

Videos shared on social media and by Israeli news outlets showed dozens of festival-goers running through an open field as gunshots rang out. Many hid in nearby fruit orchards or were gunned down as they fled.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 year ago

    I just think people talking about killing civilians at a music festival being an atrocity (it is!) were probably really quiet about the regular civilian casualties caused by Israel year after year. In 12 years, the UN counted 5,590 deaths. That’s not 5,590 dead terrorists, but people are acting like the atrocities just started now. I’m very much willing to say “what about”, not because it should make people think this one isn’t horrible, but because they really should answer “what about the other ones you ignored”.

    And one doesn’t even need to go backward. Israel’s already racking up civilian casualties, and you can bet there’s going to be some people who want to keep going until the Palestinian number is much higher than the Israeli number.

    • BraveSirZaphod
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Plenty of people, within Israel and outside, care quite a lot about those deaths and also consider them tragedies. You’ll remember that Netanyahu isn’t exactly an uncontroversial figure within Israel.

      That’s why this has been such an incredibly frustrating and disappointing series of events, because any possibility of peace has been thoroughly extinguished now, and Palestinian citizens are going to suffer even more. Hamas of course knew this going into it, and didn’t care because its aim has never been peace for Palestinians, but rather the extermination of all Jews within Israel (as explicitly stated in its founding charter).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Both Netanyahu and Hamas are probably riding a nice high right now. Both of their political positions improve the more people die on both sides.

        • BraveSirZaphod
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          There may be a real rally around the flag effect, but there’s a lot of anger at Netanyahu on the massive military and intelligence failures that made this possible. He may be able to stick around for this conflict, but he’s probably toast afterwards.

          Likud’s entire thing has always been that they’re the ones that can be trusted to keep Israelis safe. That view is now completely shattered.

          • @assassin_aragorn
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            Perhaps there’s a glimmer of hope then. If a less conservative and radical party takes control, maybe we’ll see an independent Palestinian state that’s allied with Israel and jointly fights Hamas.

            Unfortunately that’s very unrealistic :/. We’ll probably see an even more radical conservative group take power, and make us think Netanyahu was a saint in comparison. :/

            • BraveSirZaphod
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              That assumes that there is a sizable portion of Palestinians that want to fight Hamas, and there’s sadly no guarantee of that.

              • @assassin_aragorn
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                I know, but I’d like to be optimistic. I’d like to think that becoming an independent state in exchange for helping hunt Hamas would be more than agreeable to them.

                It saves me from the moral quandary – what if you’re right? What if the people generally support the group :/? I would need evidence to believe it, but I don’t know then. It’s pretty difficult to be neutral about them and not have a thought either way.

                • BraveSirZaphod
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  The biggest hurdle with that is that it’s essentially been tried. The IDF had occupied Gaza just like it currently does the West Bank until 2005, when they withdrew as a token of goodwill towards peace.

                  Gazans immediately elected Hamas and started launching rockets at Israel. Israel is not going to repeat that.

                  • @assassin_aragorn
                    link
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    Is there a handy article I could read about this? I’d like to know more about it

    • @flossdaily
      link
      English
      -141 year ago

      Israel has never targeted civilians. Palestinians have always targeted civilians.

      Hamas uses civilians as meat shields.

      When people like you take INTENT out of the equation, your just doing Hamas’s bidding.

      • TheDankHold
        link
        fedilink
        171 year ago

        They literally shot a journalist in the head and then sent military thugs to rough up people at the funeral. Your perspective is severely lacking context on one side.

        • @flossdaily
          link
          English
          -121 year ago

          According to who?

          You have to take these stories with a grain of salt.

          Do you remember the Jenin massacre?

          Do you remember all the awful things that the Israelis did? It was horrific.

          … Except …

          It never happened. The Palestinians lied about it.

          • TheDankHold
            link
            fedilink
            16
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You know you can look this up so you don’t come across as an ignorant partisan right?

            Her name was Shireen Abu Akleh

            From the article:

            “Several independent investigations carried out by various bodies and organisations, including the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, concluded that Abu Akleh was most likely killed by seemingly well-targeted shots fired by Israeli forces, despite her wearing clear identification as a journalist. Internal investigations carried out by the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) found “a high possibility” that Abu Akleh was “accidentally hit” by IDF gunfire. However, to date, Israeli authorities have not opened a criminal investigation into her death or held anyone accountable.”

            So are you willing to amend your previous claim? Or do you just want to cast doubt on anything that shows the Israeli government in a bad light?

            Edit: I almost forgot, here’s proof that Israeli military went to the funeral to beat pallbearers and others: https://apnews.com/article/shireen-abu-akleh-journalist-funeral-west-bank-bb71e2ec64dd034066bc6df4a9aa2fb3

            And you know what, have some more quotes from the original article:

            “The experts also decried the record-high number of killings of Palestinians in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem in recent months in the context of raids by Israeli forces, often targeting refugee camps. In 2022, out of 9000 Israeli operations, 702 targeted refugee camps in the occupied West Bank. In 2023, already more than 100 Palestinians have been killed in the context of such operations, including in Jenin, Nablus and Jericho. Since 2001, at least 18 Palestinian journalists have been reportedly killed by the IDF in the occupied Palestinian territory and no one has been held accountable for those deaths.”

            • @flossdaily
              link
              English
              -181 year ago

              Again, the sources are suspect. The UN has been widely, absurdly anti-Israel to an absolutely comical extent.

              • @vind
                link
                English
                161 year ago

                “anything that says something I don’t support is suspect” get your head out of your ass.

                • @flossdaily
                  link
                  English
                  -131 year ago

                  Sorry, but the UN’s anti-Israel bias is extremely well documented. They’ve earned my skepticism and yours.

                  • @vind
                    link
                    English
                    31 year ago

                    Okay then start citing some sources, because everyone opposing your view has cited their sources but you’ve shown nothing to back up your bogus claims.

                  • @Nudding
                    link
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    Lmao, to say Israel doesn’t target civilians is retarded. They literally shut off water and power to 2 million civilians, that’s a war crime.

              • @Nudding
                link
                English
                61 year ago

                Do you think that’s because every other nation has it out for israel? Or because Israel has been doing war crimes for decades?

                • @flossdaily
                  link
                  English
                  -51 year ago

                  Every nation? Not at all. An overwhelming number of Arab nations? Yes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        Then it sure is strange how they keep doing things that kill civilians. They’re not blowing up buildings because that particular building was especially good for launching rockets. It’s collective punishment optimistically aimed at some sort of regime change, but more likely just to feed domestic bloodlust. It’s certainly not degrading military capabilities. They’re gone well before the missile hits.

        And this is just the direct deadly violence. They knock down houses and light their fields on fire. Those are civilian targets in service of ethnic cleansing, either performed directly by the state or by agents supported and defended by it.

        • @Shardikprime
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          Hamas sets up military operations in a civilian building by force - the civilians have no say in this and get killed if they protest Hamas then uses that building to launch rockets, store ammunition, communication stations How the fuck should Israel proceed to neutralize those sites? Because what they do is:

          “Roof knocking”: Hitting the building’s roof with a small explosive to announce that it will fall in 15 minutes (see video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teevWpXlRZY example from yesterday) Automatic SMS and phone calls impacted areas warning and urging to evacuate Precision strikes that make the building fall vertically with minimal damage to the areas As a result, civilians (and potentially military personnel) are given a chance to evacuate while ammunition stashes, rocket launching stations etc stay in the building and are destroyed.

          To be honest, I’m shocked those protocols are still used after Hamas’s attack. I would absolutely not be surprised of these measures stopped.

          The anti-Israel don’t care that Israel is bending over backwards to minimize human suffering while fighting a decades long war against people who are deliberately trying to kill their children.

          Remember how upset they are when Israel does something 100 percent defensive, like build a security fence to keep out an endless stream of suicide bombers?

          This isn’t good-faith criticism.

          These people hate Israel for this that they works be applauding other countries for. And we all know why

      • BraveSirZaphod
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        A take I read earlier today is that Hamas tries to kill as many Jews as possible, Israel tries to kill as few Palestinian citizens as possible, and neither side is very successful.

        Sounds about right really.

        • @flossdaily
          link
          English
          -81 year ago

          I don’t think that’s a great assessment. Israel is much better at avoiding civilian casualties than even the United States.

          If they are the best in the world at minimizing civilian casualties during military operations, your definition of “very successful” might need some reexamination.

          • @vind
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            Is that right?

            • @Shardikprime
              link
              English
              -31 year ago

              This is a chart that shows one thing only: Israel has the stronger military.

              It doesn’t say a thing about who attempted to kill more civilians, and who took steps to avoid civilian deaths. It doesn’t say anything about who has made concessions for peace, and who has walked away from peace deals for almost a century.

              If you think this chart shows that Israel is the bad guy, you would absolutely shit yourself if you saw a similar chart comparing the US and Nazi Germany.

              • @vind
                link
                English
                51 year ago

                This chart illustrates that Israel has disproportionately killed more Palestinians.

                Similarly, here is a chart illustrating that the Axis killed allied people (incl. Civilians) at a disproportionate amount.