• @sramder
    link
    English
    111 year ago

    Anyone know how many hours of training data it takes to build up a convincing model of someone’s voice? It was 10’s of hours when I did a bit of research a year ago… the article says social media is the likely source of training data for these scams, but that seems unlikely at this point.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Is it safe to assume that if you don’t have any family that posts videos to Facebook/socials you are in a safer place?

        • @NeoNachtwaechter
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          if you don’t have any family that posts videos to Facebook/socials you are in a safer place?

          You are safe only if you don’t have any people at all whom you trust.

          But then you are having some other problems…

      • @sramder
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        The technology has clearly come a long way in a short time, really fascinating.

        I remember the first examples I read about being trained with celebrity read audiobooks because they needed so much audio data. I want to say Tom Hanks or Anthony Hopkins but I could have that confused with something else.

    • @CrabLangEnjoyer
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      A current state of the art ai model from Microsoft can achieve acceptable quality with about 3 seconds of audio. Commercially available stuff like eleven labs about 30 minutes. But quality will obviously vary heavily but then again they’re using a low quality phone call so maybe not that important

      • @sramder
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        That’s downright scary :-) I think it took longer in the last Mission Impossible.

        30 minutes is still pretty minimal for the kind of targeted attack it sounds like this is used for. I suppose we all need to work with our families on code words or something.

        I went in thinking the article was a bit alarmist, but that’s clearly not the case. Thank for the insight.

      • @madsen
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        With that little, they may be able to recreate the timbre of someone’s voice, but speech carries a multitude of other identifiers and idiosyncrasies that they’re unlikely to get with that little audio, like personal vocabulary (we don’t choose the same words and phrasings for things), specific pronunciations (e.g. “library” vs “libary”), voice inflections, etc. Obviously, the more training data you have, the better the output.

    • DontMakeMoreBabies
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I literally just cloned someone’s voice for a presentation on AI and did it using maybe 30 total minutes of audio…

      Took me about an hour and it was free. Hardest part was clipping the audio to get the ‘good bits.’

      The voice was absolutely convincing.

      • theodewere
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        it’s no wonder actors are taking an interest, given the level of tech Disney and everybody else must have access to

      • @sramder
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Wow! That’s really impressive.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      TorToiSe can work off of just three ten second clips when you’re using a pre-trained model. No telling if that’ll sound any good.

      • @sramder
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        I’ll have to check that out, thanks for the link.

    • Johanno
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      The most advanced Model I know just needs half an hour of your voice or sth.

      • @sramder
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        Someone else mentioned that Microsoft has one capable of working with far less material.

        But 30 minutes is definitely short enough to make this sort of scam/attack feasible in my mind.