I don’t think justification is only about righteousness. Justifying an action is finding reason for why that action occurred. That can include giving reason why its righteousness. But it also includes giving reason why it happened.
So for me, I don’t care the reason because to me there is no reason that can justify it. To me it is beyond reasonable. I recognize there’s history. But I am saying that history does not justify the action. I don’t empathize with a group that takes this action.
I understand you are not agreeing with what happened. But you are giving a reason and giving reason is a form of empathy and the context you provided is what I would consider justification.
Well, it’s in the term: justify, to show something is just. It has value assessment. Anyway, you’re right, I’m not agreeing with what happened. But I also think that in general if we don’t try to understand reasons, no matter how abhorrent we find them, how do we prevent such things from happening again?
I’m tired of seeing people being labeled as good or evil or whatever and that being used as the reasoning why someone behaved the way they did. We can understand situations, conditions and human psychology better than that and we should try to understand why horrible things happen. This applies to murder, abuse, any kind of violence, including the topic at hand. Only if we begin to understand the underlying reasons can we become proactive instead of reactive. I see it as a way to prevent further suffering and loss of lives, not a justification.
Anyway, if you find it emotionally too taxing, I can understand that. But I hope you can see that not everyone trying to understand the reasons is trying to justify it.
I don’t think justification is only about righteousness. Justifying an action is finding reason for why that action occurred. That can include giving reason why its righteousness. But it also includes giving reason why it happened.
So for me, I don’t care the reason because to me there is no reason that can justify it. To me it is beyond reasonable. I recognize there’s history. But I am saying that history does not justify the action. I don’t empathize with a group that takes this action.
I understand you are not agreeing with what happened. But you are giving a reason and giving reason is a form of empathy and the context you provided is what I would consider justification.
Well, it’s in the term: justify, to show something is just. It has value assessment. Anyway, you’re right, I’m not agreeing with what happened. But I also think that in general if we don’t try to understand reasons, no matter how abhorrent we find them, how do we prevent such things from happening again?
I’m tired of seeing people being labeled as good or evil or whatever and that being used as the reasoning why someone behaved the way they did. We can understand situations, conditions and human psychology better than that and we should try to understand why horrible things happen. This applies to murder, abuse, any kind of violence, including the topic at hand. Only if we begin to understand the underlying reasons can we become proactive instead of reactive. I see it as a way to prevent further suffering and loss of lives, not a justification.
Anyway, if you find it emotionally too taxing, I can understand that. But I hope you can see that not everyone trying to understand the reasons is trying to justify it.