Utah sues TikTok, alleging it lures children into addictive and destructive social media habits::Utah has become the latest state to sue TikTok, alleging the social media company is “baiting” children into addictive and unhealthy habits.

  • @killeronthecorner
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    Mm no, they just said it was worse. You’re reaching.

    • @paintbucketholder
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      No, they said it was “far worse,” which definitely implies a ranking of how bad they perceive the respective issues.

      • @killeronthecorner
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        It’s possible for more than one thing to be bad, we don’t have to pick just one of the two.

        This is what they said; they implied the root comment was saying that two things couldn’t be bad or only one could be solved. But it didn’t. He said, paraphrasing, “there are two issues and I find this one to be far worse”.

        Ranking issues in terms of how bad they are seems a fairly normal thing to do. It also implies that there is more than one.

        • @paintbucketholder
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          they implied the root comment was saying that two things couldn’t be bad or only one could be solved.

          I don’t agree with that interpretation.

          They simply stated that ranking things by “badness” also implies a ranking in terms of which one of those bad things is more urgent and should be addressed first - not that one thing was bad and that the other wasn’t, or that only one thing could be addressed.

          • @killeronthecorner
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            It’s a bad interpretation but you are, or course, welcome to it

            • @paintbucketholder
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              I’m merely reiterating the position of the poster you replied to.

              You can disagree with that position, but you seemed to be replying to a position that nobody was even taking.

              • @killeronthecorner
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                I am not, you just haven’t understood the position. But that’s fine.

                • @paintbucketholder
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  You were clearly arguing against a position that nobody here took.

                  That means you either lack the reading comprehension to understand what was stated, or you’re purposefully creating a strawman to argue against.

                  • @killeronthecorner
                    link
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    I’ve explained in detail, you’ve not understood the explanation and taken an illogical stance.

                    I can’t help you out of a hole you’ve put yourself in. It’s okay to disagree though, you don’t have to lower yourself to ad hominems.