FTC lays out new rule that could end hidden fees | The agency is proposing a new rule that could require businesses, from hotels to ticket sellers, to provide clear disclosures on costs and whether…::The US Federal Trade Commission is proposing a new rule known as the Trade Regulation Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees that it hopes will stop businesses from charging consumers hidden fees.

    • GreyBeard
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Meh, we computers that can do the math, and the labels are all printed. There is no reason why the labels can’t be sales tax included these days. I understand it is harder when running commercials or billboards, but in store there is no excuse.

      • phillaholic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        Online you’d need to input your address before ever seeing pricing which I personally don’t care for. In-store would be easier from that perspective but there are so many exemptions and jurisdictions it would take a ton of work to switch over. Some tax code would have to be rewritten. Possible, but far more work than what the FTC is currently talking about.

        An example of one of these complexities. In 13 states, sales tax is collected on a Milkyway but not a Twix.

        • Hildegarde
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          The webside can just list prices with the highest tax rate in their database, absent a location. No one will ever complain about a price decrease when they go to check out.

          • phillaholic
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            Until you’re trying to use a $10 off $50 coupon. This is constantly a problem at groceries stores. Multiple coupons, instant savings, and bonus points. You need a damn spreadsheet to make sure you meet each criteria.

        • GreyBeard
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          The register can figure that out, why can’t the label maker?

          • phillaholic
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -21 year ago

            It’s not an issue of can or can’t, it’s an issue of the consumer not knowing why a Milky Way is $1.07 vs a Twix at $1.00. On the receipt they can see one is taxed and the other is not.

            • GreyBeard
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              Does that matter to the consumer? Shouldn’t they know that a Milky Way cost 7 cents more than a Twix when picking their candy?

              • phillaholic
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                Shouldn’t they know why? Does it just cost more or is it because the government is doing it?

            • eric
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              No one’s saying you don’t show the tax on the receipt. It’s not like no one has figured it out yet.

              The EU requires tax to be included in prices displayed to customers, and each country has their own specific country regional and local tax codes. They manage just fine, so can the US.

              • phillaholic
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -11 year ago

                The VAT rate doesn’t change inside each country does it? The US doesn’t have VAT, and the federal government doesn’t have sales or use tax.

                • eric
                  link
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  Yes VAT does change from country to country. Also VAT is more complex than sales tax in that it is applied to various consumer goods as well as some services.

                  • phillaholic
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    01 year ago

                    inside each country. For example is there a different VAT in Paris than Cannes?

    • danque
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Because it was designed that way. In other countries its far more simple to implement.

      • phillaholic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Right, but you’re talking about potentially changing how 13,000 Jurisdictions structure their taxes. Not an easy under taking.