• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Thats still very much generalizing. What this meme essentially says is that if you’re a capitalist, you’re not part of Lemmy.

    On a seperate note, you cant possibly know how many people on Lemmy actually support capitalism or not. It has a left tendency, yes, but I bet the majority of Lemmx users do support caputalidm in some shape or form.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      No, it is saying that if you are capitalist, you will get pushed into a corner by downvotes and can’t enjoy the discussion as much as everyone else.

      As is clearly shown with this comment.

      If you actually read the posts made here on Lemmy (and I don’t mean the hexbear lemmygrad ones) you should still clearly see a contempt towards the capital class.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        The upvote ratio on this comment (which is at 15up to 15down currently) is in no way representative of Lemmy. At best its representative of this specific community ([email protected]).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -2
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Does anyone here own capital? As in being haut bourgeoisie? Probably not.

      If you support capitalism and you’re not a capitalist you’re just a bootlicker.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -111 months ago

        And you live on your own self-sustaining compound, posting from your open hardware, fabricated in free factories, Libre software OS and applications, with compost-generated power? Didn’t think so. Welcome to the gray zone bootlicker.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -411 months ago

          “If you dont own factories you dont benefit from the system, you should not defend it”

          “Oh okay, so you have completely isolated yourself from the system then?”

          No, that’s not the point, the point is to end the exploitation, not escape it, which is always a fanciful idea as you cannot escape the indirect effects of it. Also do you think almost anyone is capable of doing the things you mentioned? You’d have to be really wealthy to do those things.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            You used the wrong quote from yourself. What you quoted from me was a reaction to this gem of a statement:

            If you support capitalism and you’re not a capitalist you’re just a bootlicker.

            which is black and white, and typical of us-good versus them-bad argument fallacies. If you live and participate in a capitalist system, as the vast majority of humanity does, you are, to some degree, supporting it.

            Based on the comments in this thread I take your position to be it’s a matter of degree of support. Owning a truck isn’t capital, it’s apparently got to be a lot to make someone a capitalist. That is not leftist or anti-capitalist, but simply “eat the rich”. Most people exist in classes that participate in ways that keep the lower earners below. I do not believe most humans think this great system for all but feel helpless, and participate as a way to simply exist.

            Surely spreading insulting, erudite rhetoric in online is not the solution.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -411 months ago

              Owning a truck isn’t capital, it’s apparently got to be a lot to make someone a capitalist.

              Owning a truck for personal transportation is literally personal property, not private property. Can you give me a quick definition according to Marxists of personal and private property?

              Because you speak as if you’re qualified to define leftist:

              That is not leftist or anti-capitalist, but simply “eat the rich”.

              I do not believe most humans think this great system for all but feel helpless,

              That is capitalist realism for you.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                Can you give me a quick definition according to Marxists of personal and private property?

                It is possible, but not worth it.

                That is capitalist realism for you.

                That is realism. Which is usually quite valuable if you want to change a system.

                You seem hell bent on apply the label capitalist as an epithet on just about everyone you respond to. Can you quickly tell us what you think it will accomplish?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -411 months ago

                  It is possible, but not worth it.

                  Okay, so no, you don’t. And you’re more interested in coming off as knowledgeable than learning (because you could just look it up in 5 seconds and give a definition), which is cowardly behavior.

                  That is realism. Which is usually quite valuable if you want to change a system.

                  Capitalist realism isn’t realism, it is specifically referring to the “end of history” narrative

                  You seem hell bent on apply the label capitalist as an epithet on just about everyone you respond to. Can you quickly tell us what you think it will accomplish?

                  I’m using preciae language that would be understandable if you knew the first thing about socialism, which you claim to.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    010 months ago

                    It is cowardly behaviour to refuse to look something up that “takes 5 seconds” because you wanted me too?

                    Nowhere was capitalism equated to realism in my posts. That does make any sense. Why would you write that?

                    You claim I do not understand precise language, and therefore do not know the first thing about socialism. That also makes no sense.

                    These are non-sequitors.