If you’re confused why you can’t currently download Ubuntu 23.10 despite the fact it’s been released (and blogs like mine are telling you it’s out) there is a reason.

[From Twitter]: “We have identified hate speech from a malicious contributor in some of our translations submitted as part of a third party tool outside of the Ubuntu Archive. The Ubuntu 23.10 image has been taken down and a new version will be available once the correct translations have been restored.”

Now, I’m not 100% certain but from poking around the Ubuntu Desktop Installer GitHub — I know, I’m nosey — appears to have been (sadly) the Ukrainian translation file that was hijacked. I ran the text through a translator and …Honestly, I wish I hadn’t.

It’s a broad range of offensive sentences touching on politics, sexuality, and current events. Though shocking, none of it is particularly coherent in scope. It seems to be written to be provocative for provocations sake – the sort of stuff people post on X to farm likes from far-right bots.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1831 year ago

    As an aside remark, it’s really funny how everyone has to elaborate what the fuck they’re talking about when they talk about Twitter.

    In a post on X (formerly Twitter) Ubuntu explains the situation

    could have just been written as

    In a tweet, Ubuntu explains the situation

    but the epic genius elon decided to destroy all brand recognition. Truly incredible thing to witness. Twitter literally got its own branded terms into common lexicon and he just set it all on fire.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Which is amazing that X isn’t being sued by Xorg. I guess they probably don’t have the same amount of money (although Twitter is probably going to be negative soon). It’s also not really competition, but they’re both tech companies. I could easily see Xorg winning that one.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Whoever has the most money automatically wins a lawsuit, because X could EASILY just get more lawyers to make more BAD faith arguments.

    • @xkforce
      link
      481 year ago

      He didnt just set the brand recognition on fire, elon basically did everything someone would do if they wanted to intentionally run twitter into the ground.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          171 year ago

          In a Y (formerly known as post) on Y (formerly known as reddit) a Y (formerly known as user) “vaporeonpissdrinker69” has said that…

      • @Venat0r
        link
        15
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Maybe that was his plan for creating true free speech, by driving everyone away from twitter to mastodon…

        A very 200iq plan, only cost him $44B

        • @xkforce
          link
          151 year ago

          It cost him a lot more than that. He lost about 200 billion in stock value that he owned and among the companies he “runs” about a trillion was lost in total due to investers dumping stock after seeing his ineptitude on full display.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            a trillion

            Wait, he was a trillionaire before? Interesting, now I’m curious what effects did this made to the economy, it would be a fun read (maybe).

            • @KISSmyOS
              link
              6
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              deleted by creator

            • @xkforce
              link
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No. The companies he controls at some level lost about a trillion in stock value combined

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “In an X(formerly known as a tweet) on X(formerly known as Twitter) …”

        It just rolls off the tongue!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        The Prince one is different, since he changed his name to something that can’t be even spelled.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      The current branding gives more a placeholder asset feeling than a memorable identity. Sorry the twitter logo isn’t loading so we’ll show you an “X” in the meantime

    • fadingembers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      On some news stories I’ve been seeing them refer to it as “the social media company X”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      They could just keep calling tweet, or tweet on X, maybe they just keep this shit to show how stupid the change is…