Hamas has called on Palestinians to stay in their homes after Israel issued sweeping evacuation orders for almost half of Gaza’s more than 2.3 million people ahead of an expected ground offensive.

The Hamas authority for refugee affairs today told residents in the north of the territory to “remain steadfast in your homes and to stand firm in the face of this disgusting psychological war waged by the occupation”.

  • @givesomefucks
    link
    English
    961 year ago

    Gaza is more densely populated than LA and they have no electricity, water, or fuel.

    The only exit is thru Egypt, and Israel keeps blowing it up.

    Even if the message got to everyone, there’s no way people could do what Israel told them.

    Israel knows this. They weren’t trying to “help” by announcing they’re going to flatten half of Gaza, they want to cause panic and riots.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In this specific case isreal asked residents of Gaza city, a subpart of the Gaza strip to move to a more southern position in the Gaza strip. Like asking people to move from Manhattan to Brooklyn because they are going to blow up Manhattan. People are capable of moving within the Gaza strip. That doesn’t mean there will be housing for them however.

      • @givesomefucks
        link
        English
        681 year ago

        That doesn’t mean there will be housing for them however.

        Or food… Or water…

        Or shelter for a few days from now when Israel starts bombing the southern half.

        All this is doing is motivating residents of Gaza to pick up arms against Israel.

        Which a cynic would say is exactly what Israel wants

          • snooggums
            link
            fedilink
            351 year ago

            Teaching and motivating are two different things. Heck, they are even different words!

          • @filister
            link
            English
            91 year ago

            So the answer of Israel of what happened 6 daysis to kill even more civilians and to create unimaginable humanitarian catastrophe in an already occupied territory. And what do you think this will achieve? Hint, it is not going to be exactly long lasting peace.

      • Otter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 year ago

        Like asking people to move from Manhattan to Brooklyn because they are going to blow up Manhattan

        Even if this analogy was representative, this would ALSO be a complete mess to try and do and that’s in a city with working roads, fuel, transportation options, easy access to telecoms/information, and support personnel. Even with all that, it would not be possible to do in 24 hours.

        I don’t think the analogy helped

          • @filister
            link
            English
            101 year ago

            I am not defending the atrocities of Hamas, but what Israel is systematically doing with Palestinians isn’t exactly a role model.

          • Otter
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            I agree that they should try, that wasn’t the part I was commenting on

          • @theluckyone
            link
            English
            171 year ago

            A random guy on the Internet says it’s false. MSN says it’s true.

            Gee, who should I believe? /S

              • @theluckyone
                link
                English
                14
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I did. To quote:" Most of the travelers were Dual European-Palestinian families fleeing out of Gaza," Younis Tirawi, a Palestinian reporter, posted on X, along with a video of the chaos shortly after the strike landed. “There were casualties.” The video appeared to show people screaming and running away as smoke billowed near the crossing…

                … After the strike, IDF officials said the Rafah border crossing between the Gaza Strip and Egypt was not the specific target in the counter-attack against Hamas and that the bombs were intended to strike an underground smuggling tunnel nearby, per CNN."

                Sure sounds like they targeted and hit the border crossing to me. “Nearby” is ambiguous. Could be a mile, could be five feet. “Wasn’t a specific target” implies it was a general target. Otherwise, the statement should have read “was not a target.”

                  • @filister
                    link
                    English
                    51 year ago

                    Check again the numbers of the civilian casualties on both sides and tell me how unfortunate they are.

                    Believe me, by the time this escalation ends, the number of the victims of the Palestinian side would be more than 10K. And that would be the direct, the indirect ones, due to lack of food and water would be even more.

                    And I think after this conflict, even tougher restrictions would be imposed on both Gaza and the West Bank, which would make their lives even harder. Not to mention how many people would have lost their homes and all their possessions.

                    Can you imagine something like this happening to you, your friends, your family, how exactly would you feel? Serious question!

                  • @theluckyone
                    link
                    English
                    2
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    That may be your opinion. My opinion is that the worst case scenario is that they were purposely targeted. Best case is that the IDF views them as fortunate casualties. After all, why should the IDF care about human animals?

              • @assassin_aragorn
                link
                English
                111 year ago

                Whatever the case, they bombed it. They should have known the variability in where it would land and called off the operation when they saw the humanitarian corridor was in that zone.

                • BraveSirZaphod
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -71 year ago

                  Was anybody actually hurt?

                  Telling people to go to an area and then bombing a valid target next to it is scary, sure, but it’s not a deliberate attempt to kill civilians.

                  • @theluckyone
                    link
                    English
                    81 year ago

                    Did you read the article? I quote: “There were casualties.”

                  • @assassin_aragorn
                    link
                    English
                    51 year ago

                    Sure, but you really shouldn’t tell people a zone is safe if there’s a decent probability an attack could spill over into it.

                  • @filister
                    link
                    English
                    21 year ago

                    Justice for thee by not for me

              • @gmtom
                link
                English
                41 year ago

                Lmao and you take them at face value. You’re either a shill or gullible as fuck.

                • circuscritic
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  I tried browsing his comment history because I had the same assessment, and honestly, it’s 50/50.

                  My best guess is that he’s just so fervently pro-Israel that if he ever comes across anything that doesn’t 100% confirm his own biases, he immediately turns away.