@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year ago"Useless syntax sugar": Numbered block parameters in Rubyzverok.spaceexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down13cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up145arrow-down1external-link"Useless syntax sugar": Numbered block parameters in Rubyzverok.space@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square33fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@exussumlink1•1 year agoIn what way? If you encountered a function that had x and y which just added them together, that’s not readable enough?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoWell in a vacuum yes sure, you’re right, but in practice there’s always some context. x and y could be referring to axes, where an addition makes little sense. However lhs and rhs make more sense if you’re overloading an operator
In what way? If you encountered a function that had x and y which just added them together, that’s not readable enough?
Well in a vacuum yes sure, you’re right, but in practice there’s always some context. x and y could be referring to axes, where an addition makes little sense. However lhs and rhs make more sense if you’re overloading an operator