• @jarfil
    link
    -11 year ago

    You’re conflating “conspiratorial thinking” with “conspiracy theories”.

    Conspiracies are a real thing, they happen all the time (and most are punishable by law); conspiratorial thinking is people coming up with, and believing, conspiracies no matter how impossible they are, which is way different from actual conspiracies.

    “Conspiracy theories” just happens to be a term that can be used in both cases, it doesn’t mean all of them are impossible.

    • @aesthelete
      link
      31 year ago

      Nah, I’m not.

      Conspiratorial thinking is what gives you the bunkum conspiracy theories, and the evidence or lack thereof has nothing to do with their production.

      As far as I can tell from my reading they come more from an environment of distrust often combined with disordered thinking.

      Sure there can be actual conspiracies, but they also usually come with accompanying evidence and more than hunches, hindsight, or temporally related events.

      • @jarfil
        link
        11 year ago

        Sure there can be actual conspiracies, but they also usually come with accompanying evidence and more than hunches, hindsight, or temporally related events.

        Evidence is what turns a “conspiracy theory” into either a “proven conspiracy” or a “debunked conspiracy”. Without the former, there would be none of the latter… not sure how is that hard to understand.

        • @aesthelete
          link
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Still waiting for the actual, solid evidence behind your conjecture.

          See the thing is that logical thinking follows the evidence rather than jumping to conclusions.