• Throwaway
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Thats because the added weight and power tears up trails, and the stewards hate that shit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      But that’s not actually enforceable?

      According to federal law, I mean?

      I’m guessing each state and county can make their own laws

      • @grue
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        A “no motor vehicles” sign would not prohibit e-bikes. However, I see no reason why a trail couldn’t enforce prohibition of a list of categories that includes both motor vehicles and e-bikes as separate items.

        • Iceblade
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Why not? An electric motor is, by definition, a motor.

          • @grue
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            Legal definitions aren’t the same as dictionary definitions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        The federal law applies to the public roads. Trails are NOT public roads. They can have any restrictions their management wants. Just like private roads at supermarkets - they’re not public roads and supermarket can say no Ford cars here and you have no recourse there.

          • Throwaway
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            They aren’t private usually, they’re public, but maintained by volunteers.

            I helped maintain a trail for a couple years back when ebikes were just starting to be a thing, and they absolutely tore up trails. We had to put up additional signs (from the very limited budget) just for ebikes.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Ah, got it. I don’t go on tiny trails or dirtbiking trails.

              Pretty much all hardpack or paved.