• 𝙣𝙪𝙠𝙚
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -221 year ago

    So automated driving is dystopian? Brace yourself, I have news about self-driving cars

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      I have news about them too: they’re not actually coming anytime soon, it’s all techbro propaganda

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -21 year ago

        I believe that wide adoption of self-driving cars will take a while, but there are already autonomous taxis running around San Francisco

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Like the one that drove over that women a few weeks ago, then stopped on top of her and refused to move?

          I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Yeah, and they keep blocking emergency vehicles in intersections and the whole city wants them gone.

          They’re prototypes using real human cities as proving grounds without the consent of the population.

    • @Zeth0s
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It is not. Dystopian is an utopia turning bad. There is nothing wrong with AI, it pays my bills. The killing is what turns an utopia to a dystopia. It’s people actions and intentions, not technologies

        • @Zeth0s
          link
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago
          • AI and autonomous vehicles: utopia
          • AI and autonomous vehicles to kill: dystopian

          This is one of the most frustrating thread I’ve ever partecipated. Why discussions on weapons always turn out like talking to spoilt 4 years old kids.

            • @Zeth0s
              link
              English
              31 year ago

              That’s not the reason, but thank for trying guessing. Appreciated

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                91 year ago

                Hey, for what it’s worth I think most people here understand you completely. A killing robot is dystopian, and anyone arguing otherwise is being dense as hell.

                • @Zeth0s
                  link
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  Thanks :)

                  It helps!

                • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You must not have actually understood him then. He’s said this isn’t dystopian because it doesn’t kill automatically (after also saying it is “alpha dystopian”). It’s still dystopian, regardless of whether it can shoot on its own. Every machine of war is.

                  • @A_A
                    link
                    English
                    31 year ago

                    I appreciate your writing here at Lemmy and I find it easy to misread previous comments.

                    So, I would like to try to clarify what happened here :
                    Nuke wrote : “So automated driving is dystopian?” (+…) Then, @[email protected] answered : “It is not.” (+…)

                    Because of the rest of their comments I misread it the same way you did and I had to go back and read again (or at least my first reading was the same as what you explain).

                    it would be nice if you took it on a positive note since on the whole you and @[email protected] are saying the same thing.

                    in the hope of reading more of you, take care 🌸.

                  • @Zeth0s
                    link
                    English
                    21 year ago

                    I struggle to understand whether you are trolling. I said this thing is dystopian. It looks like the alpha version of the bad robot from robocop movie

      • @bladerunnerspider
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        “There is nothing wrong with AI, it pays my bills” = “I got mine fuck you”

        • @Zeth0s
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What do you mean? AI is super helpful, it is doing great things in many fields, including biological research, simplify life of many, supporting and helping people. It is just an umbrella name for many different complex mathematical functions.

          Clearly there are bad uses, as any powerful technology. And it is important to highlight them. This is a bad use of AI

          • @bladerunnerspider
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            Which altruistic thing is it that the AI that pays your bills does? It appears to me that AI is used for acceleration of war, deceit, and theft and conglomeration of ideas and art with no unique thoughts or perspectives. The people who own the technology will use it to enrich themselves at the expense of those who can not afford it. This is what I mean.

            • @Zeth0s
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Some of the models I built help preventing frauds on customers, i.e. help them keeping their money.

              Others support and simplify work of colleagues. There are jobs that are difficult, not pleasant and stressful in my industry, and there is an high demand from people to get help from AI.

              I don’t know your job, but AI can be very helpful improving quality of life of people in many roles.

              BTW AI has been used by artists for years now. I am not talking about generative AI. Photoshop is full of non generative AI tools. Even the spam filters of your email provider are likely nowadays AI.

              You should have a deeper look to all enormous variety of AI applications out there

      • 𝙣𝙪𝙠𝙚
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The killing

        Once again, this system does not kill autonomously. It merely drives autonomously.

        • @Zeth0s
          link
          English
          11
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It is just because it is currently technically impossibile to make it fires the “right” people. So the human will fire the wrong people as liability for human shooting civilians doesn’t exist. It is anyway dystopian. As said it is an alpha version of the dystopia.

          I really don’t get why it is so hard to understand ¯\_(ツ)_/¯