I’m a big fan of solar panels but the alignment could’ve been better!

  • @scarabic
    link
    English
    71 year ago

    I’d like to believe that we are in a transitional period with solar panels, and soon it will be more common for them to just be an integral part of the roof. However I don’t see much uptake for the companies that have tried offering such products. Has anyone seen a house with integrated panels?

    • @AlataOrange
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      That sounds way more expensive and like it has way more points of failure if you live somewhere that occasionally gets hail, tornadoes, or hurricanes. I can only speak for those locations as that’s primarily where I’ve lived, but I would much prefer my roof to be a roof then to chance anything coming in.

      • @scarabic
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Well yeah I agree that when you try to meld two things into one you generally get something more expensive than both which doesn’t perform as well as either. For something as common and well established as roofing materials, it’s going to be very very hard to beat conventional roofs on price and performance while adding electricity generation. Though to be fair, conventional solar panels probably get ripped apart in a hurricane, too.

        • @AlataOrange
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          My worry is less them getting ripped apart during a storm and more the potential hole they could leave behind due to their destruction. Any hole in a continuous surface is a weak point.

    • @fodder69
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      Not gonna happen, house are insanely cheaply built these days.

    • @eleitl
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      You will need overhead panels which can be walked upon. They are more expensive. You will also need to provide sealed gaps for thermal expansion.

    • @wabafee
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      I think Elon’s SolarCity company did something like that but it failed because of inefficiency of the panels and just expensive to install. To be fair I think having this is better than no solar panels at all. I think this will remain common until those two I mentioned with SolarCity gets resolved.

      • @scarabic
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        I agree. I have panels. They’re ugly as shit. But they help.

    • @gd42
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are multiple companies that offer solar tiles (for example: https://terran-generon.com/), but they have lower efficiency, cost more and have more points of failure than solar panels. Another problem is, tiles usually stay on the roof for much longer than the average lifespan of a solar panel and it’s much easier/cheaper to replace solar panels than solar tiles (without retiling the whole roof).