The first commercial PV solar product was nah just in 1909.

See story above, and original article in Modern Electrics magazine in 1909:

https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015051407073

EDIT

Since people didn’t read past the headline, the article is about a startup company in 1905 that developed a commercial electrical solar panel by 1909 and was worth 160 million in today’s money.

In 1909, the inventor of the solar panel was kidnapped and ordered by his kidnappers to destroy all information about this solar panel. He was eventually released, although he did not destroy the solar panel or his documentation, he did shut down his company.

So this is a pretty fascinating development considering that at this time period we actually did have early production electric cars that were manufactured in larger quantities than gas vehicles, and now we learn that solar panels were commercially available, at least for a short time.


And the solar panels could generate a fair amount of electricity:

500 volts per 10 square ft, and a smaller demonstration panel that was 3 ft x 4 ft could generate 60 watts of power (10 volts @6 amps).

Additionally, the panels were designed to charge a battery backup system.

    • ripcord
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Maybe, but the result is the same. The arguments in the article sound good but aren’t really that compelling. The points people make here are good.

      This is one of the rare cases where the answer to a headline question is “yes”

    • @LemmyIsFantastic
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      Put up a shitty leading headline and this is what you’ll get.

        • @LemmyIsFantastic
          link
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The point is, the behavior is to be expected, regardless of how it got there.