@FUCKERM to internet funeralEnglish • 1 year agoreminderimagemessage-square179arrow-up11.77Karrow-down112
arrow-up11.76Karrow-down1imagereminder@FUCKERM to internet funeralEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square179
minus-square@FooBarringtonlinkEnglish2•1 year agoEasily. The device doesn’t care who owns it, you can use one owned by another person.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoI don’t know anyone who owns one either. But go ahead, do your experiment and report back. Should only take you 5 minutes to prove your claim.
minus-square@FooBarringtonlinkEnglish1•1 year agoWhy should I do it, when plenty of people have already done so, and reported the results I talked about?
minus-square@FooBarringtonlinkEnglish1•1 year agoAre you unable to Google, or are you acting willfully dense? First example I found: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00779-018-1174-x
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-3•1 year agoLol that looks like 5 minutes of work to you?
minus-square@FooBarringtonlinkEnglish2•1 year agoNo, a study that studies way more than what I described doesn’t look like 5 minutes of work to me, why would it?
minus-square@FooBarringtonlinkEnglish2•edit-21 year agoWhy would I? Why isn’t the study I’ve linked sufficient? Why do you want me to disprove something you should easily be able to prove, and that other people have already disproven?
Easily. The device doesn’t care who owns it, you can use one owned by another person.
I don’t know anyone who owns one either.
But go ahead, do your experiment and report back. Should only take you 5 minutes to prove your claim.
Why should I do it, when plenty of people have already done so, and reported the results I talked about?
Like who?
Are you unable to Google, or are you acting willfully dense?
First example I found: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00779-018-1174-x
Lol that looks like 5 minutes of work to you?
No, a study that studies way more than what I described doesn’t look like 5 minutes of work to me, why would it?
So you gonna spot me the $40?
Why would I? Why isn’t the study I’ve linked sufficient?
Why do you want me to disprove something you should easily be able to prove, and that other people have already disproven?