I understand the intent, but feel that there are so many other loopholes that put much worse weapons on the street than a printer. Besides, my prints can barely sustain normal use, much less a bullet being fired from them. I would think that this is more of a risk to the person holding the gun than who it’s pointing at.

  • @ch00f
    link
    English
    -8
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I can kind of see the logic.

    Like book piracy was never a huge thing because you’d need a hell of a set up to make a book from scratch. Music piracy however…

    I’m sure a decently skilled craftsman could make a decent firearm with a short trip to Home Depot, but the average Joe can’t make that happen too easily. With a 3D printer, you could have a gun with next to zero skill. Like a decently motivated person is going to find a gun anyway, but this maybe addresses the less motivated people/crimes of passion, etc.

    That being said, if these are the same people advocating for a waiting period, they obviously don’t know how long 3D printing a gun takes.

    Edit: for those downvoting, I’m not saying this is a good idea. I think the same result could be had by going after whoever is hosting the design files. Like at least keep them off thingiverse and make them slightly hard to find.

    • @Phrodo_00
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      Book piracy was huge I don’t know what you’re talking about. You could get professionally printed books or you could always just photocopy them.

    • @HardlightCereal
      link
      English
      01 year ago

      Ebook piracy is a thing. Often done by the same professor who wrote the textbook.

      • @ch00f
        link
        English
        -11 year ago

        I mean before ebooks we’re a thing. Like before music piracy was a thing.