Wouldn’t it be great if you didn’t have to vote for the least horrible candidate? If you could vote for who you wanted without feeling like you’re throwing your vote away?

If we had ranked choice voting, we’d have better legislators in office to start with. And if they used it in the speaker votes this could be resolved already.

  • @takeda
    link
    31 year ago

    Even changing rules to make speaker whomever gets most votes first would reduce this to single election.

    The problem is that Republicans vote this way out of protest and to force their choice on majority.

    If there was RCV they would simply do all this privately and hold vote once they got to agreement or were giving up.

    • Zoolander
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      That doesn’t make sense. They don’t even have consensus right now within their party to vote in a FPTP system. You think they’d be able to coalesce around multiple people, in the same order?

      • @takeda
        link
        -11 year ago

        The whole point of RCV is that internally it is equivalent of running multiple runoff elections, each time eliminating the lowest performer.

        Republicans right now can run as many speaker elections as they want.

        If they had a goal to conclude it then Gym Jordan would get more votes in every run.