Though Russia is warming 2.5 times as fast as the rest of the planet, some of its scientists, RAS members and public figures regularly voice denials of climate science, sowing confusion among the populace.

In May, the RAS’s Eurasian economic integration council said that Earth’s warming is primarily due to the “outflow of potassium isotope from the Earth’ depths” and linked local climate catastrophes to the “increasing emission of natural hydrogen, which creates ozone holes.”

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in contrast, states that human release of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane have “unequivocally” led to global warming.

Present in Russian public discourse for decades, climate deniers often have backgrounds in natural sciences, engineering, paleoclimatology, or the fossil fuel industry, experts say.

    • Ильдар
      link
      English
      -491 year ago

      Just explain why we are sceptical

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        221 year ago

        I’m not sceptical, I see that climate is changing, but I like it 🤷‍♂️

        Just explain why we are sceptical

        No. You just explain why we should explain a position that moments earlier you claimed to not hold.

      • Bernie Ecclestoned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “In more than half of the cases, my experience was related to skeptics. And if you’re talking to a geologist, there is a 90% likelihood they are skeptics,” said a climate expert who requested anonymity in order to speak candidly. “Sometimes it was an aggressive stance, and sometimes just a lack of understanding.”

        Because you just don’t understand

        • Ильдар
          link
          English
          -431 year ago

          I understand clearly, and you can’t stand other opinions

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              121 year ago

              To add, you can have an opinion about a scientific fact, sure. But then, you are wrong.

              This will probably not stop them from keeping erroneous thoughts and opinions, sadly…

            • Ильдар
              link
              English
              -41 year ago

              Lead spiced with asbestos, my favorite

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You’re fully entitled to your opinion, but we have to agree that your opinion is wrong.

            It’s as if you said your cat has seven legs. Yes you might be fully convinced of that, and sadly you might be able to impress some people with it, and it may make you feel special, give you comfort or whatever. But it’s also wrong. You don’t actually have a cat with seven legs. That’s important as well.

          • @legion02
            link
            English
            51 year ago

            I think it’s more that this position is incredibly selfish and short-sighted.