• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    18
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Sorry, to clarify, not everything is in all caps. I’ll append my prefered syntax below

    WITH foo AS (
        SELECT id, baz.binid
        FROM
                bar
            JOIN baz
                ON bar.id = baz.barid
    )
    SELECT bin.name, bin.id AS binid
    FROM
            foo
        JOIN bin
            foo.binid = bin.id
    

    The above is some dirt simple SQL, when you get into report construction things get very complicated and it pays off to make sure the simple stuff is expressive.

    • @NedDasty
      link
      148 months ago

      You indent your JOIN? Why on earth? It lives in the same context as the SELECT.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        98 months ago

        I’ve seen both approaches and I think they’re both quite reasonable. An indented join is my preference since it makes sub queries more logically indented… but our coding standards allow either approach. We’ve even got a few people that like

        FROM foo
        JOIN bar ON foo.id = bar.fooid
        JOIN baz ON bar.id = baz.barid
        
      • @callcc
        link
        68 months ago

        Actually not. It’s part of the FROM

    • @Siethron
      link
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • @Cold_Brew_Enema
      link
      18 months ago

      Um you forgot the semicolon before with assuming there isn’t one in the previous statement. Syntax error. Code review failed

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        58 months ago

        There’s no way we’re running in multi statement mode… I like my prepared queries, thank you very much.