Linux Desktop: A Collective Delusion
tadeubento.com
Linux has made significant strides, and in 2023, it's better than ever. However, there are still individuals perpetuating a delusion: that desktop Linux is as user-friendly and productive as its mainstream counterparts. After a few discussions on Lemmy, I believe it's important to provide a clear review of where Linux falls short as a daily driver for average users.

Linux has made significant strides, and in 2023, it’s better than ever. However, there are still individuals perpetuating a delusion: that desktop Linux is as user-friendly and productive as its mainstream counterparts. After a few discussions on Lemmy, I believe it’s important to provide a clear review of where Linux falls short as a daily driver for average users.

EDIT: can I just make it clear I don’t agree with this article one bit and think it’s an unhinged polemic?

  • @vapeloki
    15•1 year ago

    You started with “gimp is shit”, so why not provide reasons for it?

    Or is this the apple vs android, coffee vs tea, stick vs automatic kind of subjective argument?

    What other products on windows compete with photoshop in your opinion? I don’t get your reason>!!<

      • @[email protected]
        10•1 year ago

        Nope. That’s called the burden of proof. You started by saying “gimp is shit”, it’s up to you to prove it, it’s not up to the people responding you to disprove your point of view. What you’re doing right now is called a fallacy and just totally discredit yourself.

        • @[email protected]English
          -5•1 year ago

          No. Im asking for alternatives, and then saying my opinion is that gimp is shit.

          Making excuses for not answering my question is pretty lame. If I answer you, you won’t answer me. You’ll just attack my opinions and leave. No thanks lol

      • @vapeloki
        9•1 year ago

        The answer is simple, Gimp is the only “full featured” photoshop replacement. And the os doesn’t matter for this. There is no alternative in windows besides gimp. Apples products also fall short.

        And now, why is gimp shit?

          • @vapeloki
            4•1 year ago

            You see, I answered your question. Now, where is the answer you promised? Let me guess, you don’t have any?

            • @[email protected]English
              3•1 year ago

              GIMP’s interface can definitely be less intuitive for some users.

              GIMP does not always seamlessly integrate into professional workflows.

              Photoshop offers a more extensive set of advanced features and tools, such as advanced text handling, 3D capabilities, etc, which are not as robust in GIMP.

              GIMP’s CMYK support is not robust at all.

              GIMP’s non-destructive editing features are poor in comparison to photoshop.

              GIMP’s native format (XCF) is not as universally compatible as PSD

              GIMP has significantly fewer learning resources. This is more about the community and less about the software.

              These are just a few examples.

              • @vapeloki
                3•1 year ago

                I think some parts are just a question of perspective. I am not a GFX person. But I have friends that work in this field. One of them starter learning with gimp. And he constantly is ranting about photoshop at work. He claims the interface of PS is garbage, support for some obscure file format is not even there and so on.

                So, I think it depends on what your are used to.

                For the documentation: yes! And raw image support is an issue to. Mostly because of proprietary bullshit standards, but yes. This is missing.

                Does this make gimp to a shit software? No