• Zoidsberg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Every morning they wake up and live a life of luxury, directly benefiting from the atrocities of their ancestors.

    An actual positive step would be giving the wealth back. A photo op at a museum before hopping on a plane back to their castle doesn’t help anyone.

    • PugJesus
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Every morning they wake up and live a life of luxury, directly benefiting from the atrocities of their ancestors.

      Man, every day we wake up and live a life of luxury, directly benefiting from the atrocities of our ancestors. The only difference here is the scale of that luxury.

      • Zoidsberg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I mean, yeah, and I wouldn’t blame the current victims of those atrocities for protesting.

        • PugJesus
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Have you given the wealth back from the atrocities of your ancestors?

          • Zoidsberg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -2
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I get what you’re saying, but you have to understand the difference between a middle-class worker versus a literal king and queen. I’m very aware of the opportunities I’ve been given thanks to where and when I was born, but in terms of actual transferrable wealth, all I really have to give is a 20 year old Honda.

            • PugJesus
              link
              fedilink
              61 year ago

              I agree there’s a difference, but my issue is with the principle of it. We are not and should not be responsible for the sins of our ancestors, only ourselves. If there is a sin in royal twats being rich, it is that they are rich while others suffer; not that the person who nutted in their grandmother was rich due to war crimes and genocide.