• PugJesus
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    You don’t understand why South African people would want to protest the Dutch king and queen?

    No, I don’t particularly understand why the current Dutch king and queen are being considered responsible for the actions of the Dutch 200 years ago.

    Sure, the brutal legacy of their genocide looms over the country to this day, but they went to a museum so we good now.

    “of their genocide”

    In what way were they, the current Dutch king and queen, involved? If you have some historical tidbit I’m missing, by all means, inform me of the sins of Willem-Alexander.

    Going to a museum to pay one’s respects, and accompanied by a representative of the people who suffered so, is a positive step, one that should be at least regarded neutrally, not attacked.

    • young_broccoli
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      In what way were they, the current Dutch king and queen, involved?

      Their inheritance is comprised of stolen riches. Their whole socioeconomic status is a result of the crimes of their ancestors. They didnt commit the crime but they have kept the loot and are still profiting from it.

      • PugJesus
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Their whole socioeconomic status is a result of the crimes of their ancestors.

        So, ancestral guilt.

        • young_broccoli
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Its not just “ancestral guilt”. Like I said : “they have kept the loot and are still profiting from it”, And by loot I dont mean only valuable goods but power too. They still benefit from the power imbalance between countries that was created during colonialism. Just look at the world economy and the dynamic between the “economic south” and “economic north”

          They are not guilty of colonialism “per se” but they are guilty of perpetuating, and using, the inequality and oppression that colonialism was built on for their own benefit.

          • PugJesus
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            So, do you mind telling me whose socioeconomic status isn’t a result of the crimes of their ancestors?

            • @thallamabond
              link
              English
              01 year ago

              Slaves, descendents of slaves, and the poor. You know, most people.

              • GreenM
                link
                English
                51 year ago

                Poor people or slaves could have rich ancestors who enslaved others as well though, single lost war in the medieval Africa could meant rich slaver becoming the slave .

              • PugJesus
                link
                fedilink
                51 year ago

                Many descendants of slaves and many poor people benefit from the atrocities of their ancestors, simply to a lesser degree. Short of being part of a completely dispossessed people isolated from broader society, we are all where we are due to the atrocities of our ancestors.

                • @afraid_of_zombies
                  link
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  Not even sure about that. Even if you were part of some totally isolated group for tens of thousands of years you might have rape in your ancestry. Inherited guilt doesn’t work.

              • @afraid_of_zombies
                link
                English
                51 year ago

                I was born poor but doing pretty well now. So my status started out fine and the moment I started doing well it was solely because of my ancestors? Were my ancestors in the 19th century or so slacking off in the 1990s but got their act together when I graduated college? I am really confused how this process works. How does the spiritual “status” of my ancestors interact with normal matter, why does it seem like sometimes I go to work and do my job is part of why I have money when it is really my ancestors spirits?

              • @weirdwallace75
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                Even the descendants of slaves are living in a country slavery helped build.

          • @afraid_of_zombies
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            Right ancestral guilt. Sins of the grandparents visited onto the children. People punished for crimes they didn’t commit.

      • GreenM
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        In this case lets talk about African based pirates and other groups enslaving millions of Europeans even before that and after that. Africans were slavers long before Duch arrived and they built riches on selling their own people to white man.

        Why are the African people not being blamed for their ancesstral guilt?

    • @afraid_of_zombies
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      No, I don’t particularly understand why the current Dutch king and queen are being considered responsible for the actions of the Dutch 200 years ago.

      We as a species have decided that generational debt and guilt is a good thing. Did your great great grandfather do something bad? This is means you are a bad person and should be punished for it because you benefited. This type of vindictive anti-justice is totally not sapping energy from productive activity and will create a world of cycles of revenge. Embrace it

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        This type of vindictive anti-justice is totally not sapping energy from productive activity and will create a world of cycles of revenge. Embrace it

        I caught your /s, but I’m not sure everyone will, fam

    • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Did they renounce the inheritance built on human misery and a pile of 20,000 human hands? Or that parts inherited but the sins aren’t?

      • @DeliBelly
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        You keep repeating the severed hands bit but that was Belgium, not NL. Educate yourself before meming online.

      • PugJesus
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        As amusing as I’d find the Dutch royal family ceasing to exist over ancestral guilt, as an anti-monarchist, I don’t know how many degrees of separation you require before an inheritance is no longer considered blood-soaked. Is it infinite?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Why is it acceptable to you that the wealth is handed down but ludicrous that the blood is handed down with it?

          If someone became an overnight billionaire for murdering your children, how many generations of their kids driving around in Bugattis would it take for you to consider that fortune washed of its sins?

          Apparently demanding a wealthy person part with wealth is more upsetting to some people than cutting off people’s hands to acquire it.

              • PugJesus
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                Anyone who looks closely enough can still see the wealth of the atrocities of our ancestors. So is that a yes? Is it infinite?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -31 year ago

                  Don’t exactly need a microscope to see the wealth of the royal family and you can dedicate an entire museum to the atrocities they comitted to grow it.

                  You really want someone to say “infinite” though. Do you have a point riding on it?

              • @afraid_of_zombies
                link
                English
                31 year ago

                That is a neat trick, how do you do that? Is it like Shingami eyes?

    • Hegar
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Countries are responsible for their actions. That’s how that works.

      You don’t get to rape and murder your way through a continent, continue to benefit from your genocide but escape any responsibility because lol that was the Netherlands but we’re the Netherlands, not our problem.

      • PugJesus
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Countries are responsible for their actions. That’s how that works.

        Okay, so far, we’re in agreement.

        You don’t get to rape and murder your way through a continent, continue to benefit from your genocide but escape any responsibility because lol that was the Netherlands but we’re the Netherlands, not our problem.

        How far back does your conception of collective and ancestral guilt go, here? Genuine question.

        • Hegar
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Better genuine question: how much in reparations do you think the dutch government is responsible for?

          Just the $value of the goods and labour they stole through killing and violence? Extra to account for the wealth that could’ve been created by everything the dutch stole? Should they have to pay damages for the sheer brutality - the cutting off hands, the concentration camps, etc?

          • PugJesus
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Better genuine question: how much in reparations do you think the dutch government is responsible for?

            How could I answer that without knowing how far back their guilt is supposed to go?

            You answer my question, and I’ll have the tools to answer your’s.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 year ago

              I’m not the person you’re replying to, but maybe as far back as we have receipts?

              In this case, there’s no mystery about who did what to whom and what they took. The Dutch and English kept very good records. In fact, the whole colonial project was very well accounted for.

              • PugJesus
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                I’m not the person you’re replying to, but maybe as far back as we have receipts?

                Is there any limit to this principle?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  71 year ago

                  Apparently, otherwise we would have begun the work of dismantling Western imperialism.

                  Do you think there should be a limit?

                  I personally think we should work to redress the wrongs we can, and in this case, the West could be doing a lot more to fix their crimes and being a lot less uppity about it.

                  • PugJesus
                    link
                    fedilink
                    41 year ago

                    Apparently, otherwise we would have begun the work of dismantling Western imperialism.

                    Do you think there should be a limit?

                    Seemingly controversially, I don’t believe in ancestral guilt. As a mixed-race individual, I’m not half-oppressor and half-oppressed. Reparations should be to the extent of bringing others in-line with an equal and whole share of the polity - or the international community, as the case may be.

                    As such, I would not regard there as being a set number for reparations - however many trillions it takes, it is the responsibility of those who have the necessary resources to assist those who lack the same access to resources. This is not a matter of debts to be ‘repaid’, it is a matter of recognizing the equal worth and humanity of others, regardless of nation. It is not a matter of guilt when the grandchildren of the grandchildren of the people who did these crimes are, themselves, long dead. These problems arose from division - they must end in unity and brotherhood.

                    Obviously, there are also more recent crimes to be answered for - these are a debt in a much more real sense, and it necessary for governments to both acknowledge wrongdoing and make compensation to survivors or immediate family under civil law. Though obviously nothing can undo a crime once committed, that is the process that is generally agreed upon.

              • @afraid_of_zombies
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                Wait so guilt is only inherited if it is documented well?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  I don’t think anyone seriously thinks guilt can be inherited… “Ancestral guilt” is a totally stupid concept, and framing colonial reparations that way is arguing in bad faith.

                  I thought it would be funny to point out we literally have the receipts of colonialism, but that turned out to be arguing with pigeons.

                  • @afraid_of_zombies
                    link
                    English
                    0
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I am glad the nicer version of the argument you have created for yourself matches up with the argument that you wish they had made.

        • @RedAggroBest
          link
          English
          -31 year ago

          Ancestral guilty goes back exactly as far as you can trace your ancestory. Lucky for us, that’s literally all royalty is.

          • PugJesus
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            So if you don’t trace your ancestry at all, you have no guilt? Ignorance is innocence?

            • @afraid_of_zombies
              link
              English
              31 year ago

              I am thinking it is like god. You have to believe in it first in which case evidence doesn’t matter.

    • Zoidsberg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Every morning they wake up and live a life of luxury, directly benefiting from the atrocities of their ancestors.

      An actual positive step would be giving the wealth back. A photo op at a museum before hopping on a plane back to their castle doesn’t help anyone.

      • PugJesus
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Every morning they wake up and live a life of luxury, directly benefiting from the atrocities of their ancestors.

        Man, every day we wake up and live a life of luxury, directly benefiting from the atrocities of our ancestors. The only difference here is the scale of that luxury.

        • Zoidsberg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I mean, yeah, and I wouldn’t blame the current victims of those atrocities for protesting.

          • PugJesus
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            Have you given the wealth back from the atrocities of your ancestors?

            • Zoidsberg
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -2
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I get what you’re saying, but you have to understand the difference between a middle-class worker versus a literal king and queen. I’m very aware of the opportunities I’ve been given thanks to where and when I was born, but in terms of actual transferrable wealth, all I really have to give is a 20 year old Honda.

              • PugJesus
                link
                fedilink
                61 year ago

                I agree there’s a difference, but my issue is with the principle of it. We are not and should not be responsible for the sins of our ancestors, only ourselves. If there is a sin in royal twats being rich, it is that they are rich while others suffer; not that the person who nutted in their grandmother was rich due to war crimes and genocide.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      By currently enjoying a massive amount of wealth that was extracted from their country and never returned. How is that hard for you to understand?