A blast at a Gaza hospital was not the result of an Israeli missile strike, but likely caused by a misfiring Palestinian rocket, the French military intelligence directorate (DRM) said on Friday.
What exactly do you mean by “these articles?” This seems less like an issue with Reuters’ reporting , and more like nitpicking by you to muddy the waters.
The facts you seem to require only exist in the laws of physics - everywhere else you have to work with likelihoods. Especially as Hamas wouldn’t even admit it, if caught red handed.
Do you know why I am saying this? There were PRO-Hamas Demonstrations in my country, where the murder of the Israeli Civilians on 7th October was called „Fake News“ - while on the other Hand Hamas Terrorists created First Person Videos of their atrocities and they brag about it on the Internet.
What exactly do you mean by “these articles?” This seems less like an issue with Reuters’ reporting , and more like nitpicking by you to muddy the waters.
All the ones that say “______ says Israel not responsible”
I’ve seen lots, but the quote is always non-committal and the headline portrays 100% confidence.
Even in the summaries it’s presented like that. But it never matches the direct quote.
It’s not pedantic, the difference is substantial
The facts you seem to require only exist in the laws of physics - everywhere else you have to work with likelihoods. Especially as Hamas wouldn’t even admit it, if caught red handed.
Do you know why I am saying this? There were PRO-Hamas Demonstrations in my country, where the murder of the Israeli Civilians on 7th October was called „Fake News“ - while on the other Hand Hamas Terrorists created First Person Videos of their atrocities and they brag about it on the Internet.