With nine candidates in the running for Speaker, some Republicans are raising questions over whether their votes on overturning the 2020 election results should be a factor in electing the next lea…

  • @fubo
    link
    68
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Saved you a click: Emmer (Minnesota) and Scott (Georgia) are the non-traitors.

    All the rest are insurrectionists; and thus are not actually qualified to be in any federal office at all, much less Speaker.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -531 year ago

      Unfortunately, voting democratically on an issue, however invalid, doesn’t make one an insurrectionist. An insurrection is a violent uprising, and a democratic vote is about as far away from that as you can get.

      • Decoy321
        link
        511 year ago

        Voting in support of insurrection makes you an insurrectionist. If we’re going to move the goal post, we can easily move it back.

        • blazera
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Why does this vote exist as a codified procedure then?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            Not coincidentally, an entire literature has been written on this by constitutional scholars and historians in the past few years.

          • Decoy321
            link
            61 year ago

            Because governments are not absolute, perfect systems. You can have a functionally useful system that still happens to allow bad faith participants to get voted in.

      • @morphballganon
        link
        241 year ago

        Voting to overturn a democratic election is not “a democratic vote.”

        • @NewNewAccount
          link
          51 year ago

          But what if my side lost on the first vote?! Doesn’t that mean that that vote is invalid?!?

      • @fubo
        link
        111 year ago

        Nah. For example, the members of Southern state legislatures who voted to secede from the Union and make war on the United States federal government were insurrectionists.

      • @dhork
        link
        English
        111 year ago

        Ordinarily, I would agree with you. But in this case, there was coordination between at least some of the Members and the angry crowd outside. Was every Member who voted against the certification intending to follow it up by working with the mob to intimidate everyone? No, but enough of them were to make the whole vote suspect.

        Heck, they keep doing it. When their guy didn’t get the votes, they had angry mobs clog their phone lines and make threats. They try to get their way through brute force and intimidation. You can’t then make it all better by simply holding a coerced vote and saying democracy still functions.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          They try to get their way through brute force and intimidation.

          ftfy

      • @thisisawayoflife
        link
        51 year ago

        They are no doubt fellow travelers to the insurrectionists.