Most of the world’s biggest advertisers have stopped buying ads on Elon Musk’s X, exclusive new data shows::Musk and X CEO Linda Yaccarino have recently stated that most of the company’s top-spending advertisers from last year have returned.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    341 year ago

    It’s impossible to say what anything is worth to a person who can lose 44 billion dollars and still have so much money left that the next 10 generations of their lineage won’t ever have to work again.

    It’s insane to think of that as a trivial amount of money, but musk could literally lose 99% of his money and it wouldn’t impact his life at all, except for his hobby of bankrupting corporations.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      As obscenely wealthy as he is, that wealth comes from bis assets not cash in hand. $20B of the $44B paid was cash, some of which was from selling some of his Tesla shares. Further to that, Tesla stock dropped so significantly it caused his net worth to drop by a further $30B.

      • @mriguy
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        So as a result he’s no longer so rich he could do it all again and still have more money than he could possibly spend in hundreds of lifetimes? No? Still super rich? Then it’s not really a meaningful distinction.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I disagree. It’s impossible to say for sure either way but it’s plausible his personal wealth could be wiped out, could be forced to divest his stakes in his own companies, etc.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Which would still leave him insanely rich, so the answer you are looking for is “no, elon musk is not taking any actual personal risk here at all.”

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I’m not sure how being forced to divest in your own companies to meet debt obligations would leave you insanely rich so we’ll just agree to disagree here.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                Because divesting means selling, which means.that you get money in exchange for property. How do you not understand this?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Because divesting in order to meet debt obligations means that with that money you have to immediately use it to pay debts that you owe to others, therefore you no longer have the money nor the assets. Is it really that hard to understand? If a bank foreclosures on your house it means that your property is sold and the money from the sale goes to the bank to pay off the loan.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Again, none of that impacts him in any way apart from losing the ability to literally just do it again.