Nope it’s very easy, I select the Libertarian candidate usually. I have no regrets about my voting record because I don’t compromise my principles to vote for “the lesser evil” when non-evil options are available each time.
It’s an interesting question if supporting incremental change for the better is better or worse then throwing your vote away voting third party and that has to be a choice you make for yourself.
I did notice you completely ignored the second part of what I said so did you want to weigh in on that?
What a fantastic story you’ve invented. I say shootings are rare and you’ve turned this into me shooting children. Absolutely fantastic imagination and skill.
You say shootings are rare when they’re 23 times higher than your first world contemporaries. So either you’re a bullet dodging child, or you need to go back to bullet dodging to fill those gaps in your education.
You do it every time you vote.
I’ll vote against anyone that proposes gun control just to spite you.
Then you’ll be voting against everyone because nearly everyone supports some kind of gun control.
You’ll have to track down and vote for the guys who are willing to arm people on death row if you really believe what you just wrote.
Nope it’s very easy, I select the Libertarian candidate usually. I have no regrets about my voting record because I don’t compromise my principles to vote for “the lesser evil” when non-evil options are available each time.
It’s an interesting question if supporting incremental change for the better is better or worse then throwing your vote away voting third party and that has to be a choice you make for yourself.
I did notice you completely ignored the second part of what I said so did you want to weigh in on that?
The second part didn’t have any merit worth responding to. You may refer to the Libertarian party platform for reference.
I’m impressed that you are self-aware enough to admit you aren’t able to respond to my comment.
Have a nice day!
I am able and I did respond, you’re just being a shithead now. Refer to the material that I referenced for your answer.
Personal attacks make for a very strong argument.
Why don’t you refer to the Lemmy terms of service about that one?
What a fantastic story you’ve invented. I say shootings are rare and you’ve turned this into me shooting children. Absolutely fantastic imagination and skill.
You say shootings are rare when they’re 23 times higher than your first world contemporaries. So either you’re a bullet dodging child, or you need to go back to bullet dodging to fill those gaps in your education.
Ahhh I see! You don’t understand the difference between a relative and absolute measurement.
You’re a moron…
👌👍
If self awareness was a disease you’d be the healthiest person alive.
Tell me again how most likely is rare.
Math. 30,000/ 400,000,000 == .000075.
Don’t even get me started if you remove the non violent and gang on gang member violence.
Unless you are involved in organized crime or are suicidal, your odds of encountering gun violence is absurdly small.
If comparative analysis was a disease you wouldn’t get that either.
Ahh less math, more attacks. So educated.
Less reading, more wilful ignorance. Colour me surprised.
The US has had 565 shootings so far this year. My country has none. That’s not rare that’s regular.