Spotify has removed offensive imagery associated with a controversial song by Christian rapper Tyson James and his 11-year-old son Toby James, following a complaint by GLAAD.

However, the song “Still 2 Genders,” criticized for its transphobic lyrics, continues to be available on the platform. Meanwhile, no changes have been made to Apple Music’s platform.

Earlier this month, The Advocatereported that the song was accessible on major music streaming platforms, including Spotify and Apple Music, despite its derogatory lyrics towards transgender individuals, including a slur to describe them. The situation caught the attention of GLAAD, which then took up the issue with Spotify’s trust and safety team.

In an updated statement provided to The Advocate, a spokesperson from GLAAD emphasized the importance of enforcing hate speech policies by companies.

“Companies have hate speech policies to protect all users from toxic content and especially from content that incites violence against marginalized people. When these policies are violated, it is important to see companies enforce them,” the statement read.

GLAAD’s statement highlighted the grave real-world implications of hateful rhetoric and imagery connecting it to a tragic incident.

“The terrible murder of Lauri Carlton, an ally who had hung a Pride flag outside her store, is connected to a suspect who had an image of a burning Pride flag pinned to his Twitter profile,” the statement added.

The spokesperson further noted, “Rhetoric, images, and targeting of LGBTQ people encourages real-world harms. Companies and brands must continue to recognize their responsibility to people’s safety and public safety and immediately act to avoid facilitating anti-LGBTQ hate and violence.”

Spotify responded by removing the album cover and video imagery that included a burning Progress Pride flag GLAAD noted to The Advocate. Despite these steps, the song itself, carrying an anti-trans slur and dehumanizing transgender people as “demons,” remains live on Spotify’s platform.

Both Spotify and Apple Music have policies in place to moderate content on their platforms. Apple Music for Artists’ terms of service stipulates that all lyrics provided to the platform must be “correct, accurate, and do not contain hate speech.” On the other hand, Spotify’s Dangerous Content policy bars “content that incites violence or hatred towards a person or group of people based on race, religion, gender identity or expression.”

Despite these policies, Apple Music has yet to make any changes or respond to inquiries regarding the song’s availability on its platform.

In a prior response, GLAAD had stressed the digital sphere’s struggle with hate speech moderation, especially concerning anti-LGBTQ+ content, which extends beyond the realm of music streaming platforms. Their concern was not only about the derogatory lyrics but also the inconsistency in enforcing content policies by these platforms, which undermines the safety and inclusivity of all users.

As the scrutiny continues, both Spotify and Apple Music remain unresponsive to multiple inquiries from The Advocate regarding this issue. This scenario underscores a broader discussion concerning digital content moderation on streaming platforms, especially around anti-LGBTQ+ content.

link: https://www.advocate.com/news/spotify-transphobic-song-glaad

archive link: https://archive.ph/tz9FX

  • @AWittyUsername
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    Having an opinion (even a controversial one) isn’t hate speech. Does the song actually call for anything hateful?

    • @RGB3x3
      link
      English
      201 year ago

      It’s only two genders, you’re parents are jackin’ you up

      They might as well put some crack in your cup

      You came out innocent, now you’re corrupt

      Now, you stand on the bridge, and you just wanna jump, heh

      Got these pink-haired devils

      Teachin’ the kids in the school, they are vessels

      Used by the enemy, he’s just a rebel

      Let’s turn up the kettle

      When God gets ahold of 'em, he won’t be gentle (he won’t be gentle

      Yes, it does.

      • @abuttifulpigeon
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        That’s no call to action, all those lyrics are saying is that the author believes God will punish them, he’s not telling everyone else to do the same.

        • @RGB3x3
          link
          English
          91 year ago

          The problem is that there are people who think that God has called to them to punish the “sinners,” so lyrics like that can very easily be the encouragement those people need to commit to action.

          It’s dangerous to talk about a group of people that way. It’s dehumanizing.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            This is legit a similar argument to the satanic panic or attempts to ban metal and violent video games.

            Hold bad doers responsible.

      • @AWittyUsername
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        How are people so knowledgeable on a song that they dislike. Don’t listen move on…

        • @RGB3x3
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          It took me a minute to read through the lyrics so that I could be informed about exactly what’s in the controversial song.

          It’s easy to have an informed opinion.

          • @AWittyUsername
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Or don’t read and then you don’t get outraged. Move on.

      • @cricket97
        link
        English
        -71 year ago

        Yeah it’s making fun of people. That doesn’t make it hate speech. Most of the world believes there are two genders, people are allowed to make fun of people who disagree with them.

    • @Jonna
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      Quoting from the song, “LGBTQ, Let God Burn Them Quickly” Does that qualify?

      • @AWittyUsername
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        No. You can’t call god to incite violence. God doesn’t exist, if they did I’d like to think that they’d be inclusive.