• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Its stating that because he owns a majority share, he has the ability to suppress publicly traded short term value inflation in favor of showing other private investors that long term growth is both sustainable and profitable.

    Which, as shown by how completely anti-short term the epic games store is run, is clearly a sales pitch that his other private investors are buying into.

    Which is probably the exact reason they are remaining off the public market

    • @echo64
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      This assumes a lot, it assumes a lot about the investment agreements, especially about veto rights

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        No it doesnt.

        It points at the long term focused business decisions, and then points at the private nature of its investors, and says “hey thats a pattern we see a lot with privately owned and invested companies.”