The White House is opening up $45 billion in federal funds to developers looking to turn big-city office buildings into homes.

The White House kicked off a multiagency push on Friday to help finance real-estate developers convert more office buildings in big cities emptied by the pandemic into affordable housing, taking aim at the nation’s housing crisis.

The initiative looks to harness an existing $35 billion in low-cost loans already available through the Transportation Department to fund housing developments near transit hubs, folding it into the Biden administration’s clean energy push.

It also opens up additional funding sources and tax incentives, offering a new guidebook to 20 different federal programs that can be tapped by developers and offers technical assistance in what can end up being tricky and expensive conversions.

A third peg of the program will see the federal government draw up a public list of buildings it owns that could be made available for sale to help bolster development.

  • @GingerlegsEnglish
    23•1 year ago

    Next up, your employer charging you $900 a month for your cubicle and bed.

    • partial_accumen
      3•1 year ago

      I don’t think the businesses currently owning these have any interest in running a residential apartment company. The idea is likely that companies that have large empty office buildings would sell them to companies that would refit them as residential, and then likely sell them again to companies that already have expertise in running large residential management companies.

      • @[email protected]
        1•1 year ago

        Weird how we’re using tax dollars for someone else’s investments, lol.*

        I guess it would make sense if the buildings were publicly owned, but instead they’re going to be owned by someone who charges as much rent as possible while expending as few resources as possible to do it.

        *not weird at all. The one time democrats and republicans unite on anything is when we’re funneling money to the ruling class.

        • partial_accumen
          2•1 year ago

          I know you don’t intend it this way, but that’s an oddly conservative (Republican) response.

          You’re saying we shouldn’t use tax money, and that the free market will eventually figure out that these buildings would be more profitable as residences and pay for it themselves. You may not be wrong, but it may take 20 to 25 years for that to happen. You further state the idea you don’t want to help people get affordable housing using your tax dollars.

          What is your alternative to making housing available to all the people that who would be housed by this?

          • @[email protected]
            0•1 year ago

            It won’t take 20 to 25 years for landlords to find other uses for their buildings. That’s a lot of wasted profit, which is why they’re pressuring the government to give them handouts to do it now.

            I’m fine with tax dollars going to cheap housing. I’m not fine with landlords maximizing profit off of the rent charged to tenants when tax dollars were used to renovate the building.

            I think a fair alternative would be to have a significant tax on any profits these buildings make as a result of government handouts. There should also be rent caps so they don’t just charge ‘what the market will bear,’ which is maximizing profit off of government handouts and people who can’t afford real estate.

            This is a good balance between landlords maintaining their egregious paydays and paying back the government handouts they rely on.